Monday, April 30, 2018

Mace attacks and demands to see Zuckerberg: Facebook 911 logs reveal the security challenges for Silicon Valley companies (FB)

facebook menlo park campus hacker 1 protestors cambridge analytica

  • 911 calls were made from Facebook's headquarters in California roughly once every two days over the last year.
  • Business Insider has obtained the logs for the calls, which reveal the security and emergency issues the social networking giant faces on a daily basis.
  • The company's security team battles with suspicious people harassing its employees, and in one incident, a Facebook security officer was sprayed with in the face with mace.
  • 911 was called four times in the space in a single month for mental evaluations, and there were more than 90 medical emergencies throughout the year.


SAN FRANCISCO — On the morning of January 31, 2017, a 37-year-old man arrived at Facebook's headquarters in Menlo Park, California, and demanded to speak to Mark Zuckerberg.

The visitor, who was not a Facebook employee, refused requests to leave the tech company's campus — prompting Facebook employees to call 911. Eight police officers arrived, but the man remained steadfast, ignoring their orders as he insisted he meet the Facebook CEO — and went on to try and seize a police officer's equipment, according to police records. He was subsequently found to have active warrants out for his arrest.

In another incident, on March 25, 2017, a man turned up at the Facebook campus' main entrance, saying he had been scammed after being told he had "won the Facebook lottery." Only after staff called 911 and two cops arrived did he ultimately leave.

On a third occasion, on August 18, 2017, an unidentified assailant sprayed mace in a Facebook security officer's face, then fled the scene in a vehicle before Menlo Park police could apprehend them.

These incidents, recorded in the logs of 911 emergency calls made from Facebook's Menlo Park campus between January 10, 2017 and March 28, 2018, provide a snapshot of the security issues that happen at the headquarters of one of the world's most valuable and recognizable corporations on any given day.

The 239 emergency calls made during the 14-month period — roughly one every two days — range from garden-variety workplace incidents to encounters with potentially dangerous individuals purposefully drawn to Facebook's offices. The incidents highlight the challenges tech companies face as they try to balance Silicon Valley's tradition of open, university-like campuses and casual culture with the security demands that come with offering services used by hundreds of millions — even billions— of people.

The concern is especially acute after a deadly shooting at YouTube's headquarters earlier this year. At the start of April, a YouTube user arrived at the Google-owned video company's campus and opened fire, wounding three staffers before turning the gun on herself.

The YouTube incident appears to be an isolated case, but some say it could cause tech companies to rethink their approach to security. Although the roughly 14,000 Facebook employees at the campus work in buildings that require special keycards to access, the buildings are surrounded by open space and parking lots accessible to the public. The famous Facebook thumbs-up "Like" sign at the campus entrance is a magnet for tourists and visitors who are often seen being photographed alongside it. Google and some other tech companies have campuses that are even more open to the public.

In a statement, a Facebook spokesperson said: "The safety of our employees is paramount, and we work hard every day to maintain a safe and secure environment for our community." They declined to answer questions about specific incidents.

Facebook 911 calls

Mental evaluations and medical emergencies

Around June 2017, there was a sudden surge in 911 calls requesting mental evaluations from Facebook's campus.

In the space of a little over a month, there were calls for a "mental evaluation" of unidentified individuals on four occassions, with the subjects subsequently transported to a hospital in at least three of those. Outside of that one period — between the start of June and early July 2017 — there are no other records of 911 calls for mental evaluations in the logs for the year.

It's not clear whether the people evaluated were Facebook employees, though the logs give no indication otherwise.

Of the calls, 91 (not including the four mental evaluations) were medical emergencies. On August 2, 2017, a 24-year-old woman had difficulty breathing. On October 19, 2017, someone sprained their ankle and 911 was called. On March 8, 2018, a "call came in of a female that could not walk."

There were eight calls involving suspicious persons or vehicles bothering or harassing Facebook employees.

A white van was reported being driven recklessly on campus on March 31, 2017, though police officers couldn't ultimately locate it. Someone "upset over Facebook account issues" turned up at Facebook's campus on May 15, 2017, and then after being asked to leave was found in a nearby Starbucks. "Subject was advised to stay away from campus and not return," the records note.

There are also repeat offenders. On August 11, 2017, at just after 7:30 a.m., 911 was called over "a subject that frequently comes on the campus and refuses to leave." The unidentified person "does not have any complaints or does not demand to see anyone," the logs say, "but continually causes a scene."

The subject was driven to a nearby fast-food restaurant, Jack in the Box, and warned not to return — but he arrived back on campus that very same day, a little before 1 p.m., prompting another 911 call, an escort off the campus, and an admonishment.

facebook menlo park campus

Mace, fires, and car crashes

The incident in which a man maced a security officer was the most severe, and the only of the 200-plus 911 calls classified as an assault.

Two officers "were dispatched to the location for a subject that just maced a Facebook security officer in the face. The security officer refused medical services and the subject fled in a vehicle," the records say. "Officers did an area check for the subject with the limited information they were provided and were unable to locate them." The assailant's identity and motivation is unclear.

Among other suspicious incidents, on October 11, 2017, someone turned up outside Building 10 and refused to leave, then got in their vehicle and started driving around campus. "Officers located the vehicle and the subject and advised them they were not welcome on the Facebook campus," logs say. On February 9, 2018, an "unknown subject" bothered a Facebook employee in a parking lot, leaving only when they called the police.

The logs also contain an unsurprising selection of common workplace incidents, including parking lot fender benders, a "small fire" coming from a BBQ shack on campus and two people arguing over a "non-injury accident." On April 29, 2017, a non-Facebook employee was reported to the police for riding one of the company's branded campus bicycles in a nearby neighbourhood.

Almost exactly half of the calls — 120 — were accidental: Pocket dials, immediate hang-ups, and so on.

facebook menlo park campus

Facebook isn't unique

These kind of incidents and emergencies are not unique to Facebook: An examination of any major company would likely return similar results. But the challenges Facebook faces, as a incredibly high-profile company with 2 billion users worldwide, are particularly acute.

While the details of some of the security incidents are unclear, others are clearly directly linked to the company's work — like the aggrieved person with account issues, or the man who visited the campus to speak to Mark Zuckerberg.

Employees at other tech companies have also experienced harassment from their userbases. Business Insider previously reported that YouTube employees have been receiving violent threats from video "creators" for years, and that they would sometimes camp outside the company offices for hours in attempts to talk to YouTube employees about product changes.

Facebook is now in the process of building a new campus in Menlo Park. it will integrate significantly more with the local community, featuring retail spots, housing, and public-park-style areas. The intention is to "invest" in the local area — but the increased openness means the challenges the company faces may only increase.

Do you work for Facebook? Can you shed more light on any of the incidents? Contact the author at rprice@businessinsider.com, via Twitter DM at @robaeprice, or via Signal at (650) 636-6268. Anonymity guaranteed.

SEE ALSO: Facebook shredded Wall Street's Cambridge Analytica worries with a giant Q1 and its stock is soaring

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Face-swapping videos could lead to more 'fake news'



source http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-911-data-1-hacker-way-menlo-park-2018-4

Friday, April 27, 2018

Tom Brokaw calls sexual misconduct allegations a 'drive by shooting' in angry email to colleagues

tom brokaw

  • NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw on Friday responded to allegations of sexual misconduct against him, in an email sent to NBC News colleagues and obtained by The Hollywood Reporter. 
  • Brokaw's former colleague Linda Vester told Variety and The Washington Post that Brokaw harassed and groped her in the 1990s. Brokaw, through NBC, issued a denial to the allegations.
  • Brokaw wrote in the obtained email, "I am angry, hurt and unmoored from what I thought would be the final passage of my life and career."
  • In the email, he described Vester as a "former colleague who left NBC News angry that she had failed in her pursuit of stardom," with a "reputation as a colleague who had trouble with the truth."

NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw hit back at allegations of sexual misconduct made against him by Linda Vester, a former war correspondent for NBC News, in an email sent to his NBC News colleagues and obtained by The Hollywood Reporter on Friday.

Vester alleged to Variety and The Washington Post that Brokaw harassed and groped her in the 1990s. She said that, at the time, she didn't bring a complaint to NBC. A second, anonymous woman The Post talked to also accused Brokaw of acting inappropriately. Brokaw, through NBC, issued a denial to the allegations and said of Vester that he "made no romantic overtures towards her at that time or any other.”

In the email to his colleagues obtained by The Hollywood Reporter, Brokaw was more forceful in defense of his conduct and in his criticism of Vester.

"I was ambushed and then perp walked across the pages of The Washington Post and Variety as an avatar of male misogyny, taken to the guillotine and stripped of any honor and achievement I had earned in more than a half century of journalism and citizenship," Brokaw wrote in the email.

"I am angry, hurt and unmoored from what I thought would be the final passage of my life and career, a mix of written and broadcast journalism, philanthropy and participation in environmental and social causes that have always given extra meaning to my life," he continued.

Brokaw, 78, called Vester in the email a "former colleague who left NBC News angry that she had failed in her pursuit of stardom," with a "reputation as a colleague who had trouble with the truth."

A representatives for Brokaw did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

Vester told Variety that Brokaw tried to force her to kiss him on two occasions and groped her in an NBC News conference room.

"He grabbed me behind my neck and tried to force me to kiss him," Vester said of the first alleged incident in January 1994, when she was 28 years old. "I was shocked to feel the amount of force and his full strength on me. I could smell alcohol on his breath, but he was totally sober. He spoke clearly. He was in control of his faculties." In the email, Brokaw said he kissed her on the cheek.

Vester also told Variety that when she asked what Brokaw wanted of her, he replied, “An affair of more than passing affection.” A year later, Vester said Brokaw again tried her to kiss him and that, when she pulled away, he asked, "Can you walk me to a taxi?"

"I emphatically did not verbally and physically attack her and suggest an affair in language right out of pulp fiction," Brokaw wrote in the email. He called the allegations a "drive by shooting by Vester, the Washington Post and Variety."

In an email to staff, NBC Chairman Andrew Lack wrote that, "As you have all seen now in reports from last night, there are allegations against Tom Brokaw, made by a former NBC News journalist, which Tom emphatically denies. As we’ve shown, we take allegations such as these very seriously, and act on them quickly and decisively when the facts dictate."

"My client stands by the allegations which speak for themselves,” Ari Wilkenfeld, Vester's lawyer, said in a statement to Business Insider.

Read Brokaw's full email at The Hollywood Reporter.

SEE ALSO: Former NBC newsman Tom Brokaw accused of sexual misconduct

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump tried to cut a secret deal with Planned Parenthood — here's what happened



source http://www.businessinsider.com/tom-brokaw-denies-accusations-of-sexual-misconduct-nbc-news-email-report-2018-4

US prosecutors are reportedly considering charging 'El Chapo' Guzman with the killings of 6 US citizens and a DEA agent

El Chapo Guzman Mexico prison

  • US prosecutors are reportedly considering charging 'El Chapo' Guzman with the killings of US citizens in Mexico.
  • Guzman currently faces a number of charges related to drug trafficking.
  • Prosecutors are likely to call a number of drug traffickers and former cartel members to testify against Guzman.


US prosecutors are considering charging former Sinaloa cartel chief Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman with the killings of six US citizens and a US Drug Enforcement Administration agent, according to Dallas ABC affiliate WFAA.

Three former Mexican police officers have told the US Attorney in Los Angeles that they saw Guzman take part in the killings in late 1984 and 1985. One of the officers, Jorge Godoy, who is now a protected witness in the US, told WFAA that Guzman "likes to cut the people."

The US Attorney in LA declined to comment to WFAA. A spokesman for the US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, where Guzman faces trial, also declined to comment.

Mike Vigil, former chief of international operations for the DEA, told Business Insider that prosecutors were considering adding those charges and "may link them to Chapo Guzman through drug traffickers that may testify" against him.

The killings came over a nine-week period between 1984 and 1985 and were reportedly in response to the DEA and Mexican federal police raiding and destroying the El Bufalo ranch in northern Chihuahua state in fall 1984.

The massive, 1,300-acre ranch's destruction likely constituted a multibillion-dollar loss for the Guadalajara cartel, then the most powerful in Mexico, and was particularly stinging for Rafael Caro Quintero, then one of the cartel's leaders.

Guadalajara Mexico crime scene homicide murder

The first killings came on December 2, 1984, when four Jehovah's Witness missionaries, two men and two women, knocked on the door of a drug lord. Godoy, who was then also working as a body guard for Ernesto Fonseca, another Guadalajara kingpin, said the missionaries were tortured and the women raped.

They "knocked on the wrong door," Vigil said, and the traffickers "believed they were informants or DEA agents trying to gather information."

Godoy told WFAA that Guzman shot the missionaries one by one, letting their bodies fall into an open grave. The bodies have never been recovered.

At the end of January 1985, two US citizens were killed after entering a Guadalajara restaurant where members of the cartel were eating. Godoy said he was guarding the front door when one of the Americans asked to go in.

"I said, 'It's closed and please you have to go. Please go," he told WFAA. The pair was "in wrong place at the wrong time," Vigil said.

The two began to walk away, but Caro Quintero saw them and ordered them brought inside, Godoy said, adding that he knew the Americans were likely mistaken for US agents.

The cartel members "erroneously assumed that they were DEA agents, so they took them to the back and they stabbed them to death, and the bodies were never recovered," Vigil said. Godoy claims to have seen Guzman cut one of the captive's throats and help wrap the bodies and bury them in a park.

Mexico's top drug lord Joaquin

On February 7, 1985, Guzman was dispatched to help kidnap Alfredo Zavala, a pilot who flew DEA agent Enrique Camarena to find the cartel's marijuana fields, according to Godoy. Camarena was abducted the same day, picked up off a Guadalajara street while on his way to meet his wife for lunch.

Camarena and Zavala were found a month later in shallow graves. Both showed signs of torture, and Godoy said he saw Guzman and others "jumping with their knees" on the captives, breaking their ribs.

Camarena's kidnapping and killing brought intense pressure from the US on Mexican authorities. Caro Quintero and Fonseca were caught before the end of 1985. Guadalajara cartel chief Miguel Angel Felix Gallardo, for whom Guzman worked as a driver, remained on the run until 1989. (Caro Quintero, sentenced to 40 years in prison, was released on a technicality in 2013 and was recently added to the FBI's 10 Most Wanted list.)

El Chapo Guzman police escort New York Brooklyn Bridge

Guzman is not currently charged with the killing of US citizens.

Sources told WFAA that US prosecutors may have dropped previous murder charges against Guzman because the victims were likely Mexicans killed in Mexico, but they would more able to try Guzman for the killing of US citizens in Mexico.

While the Guadalajara cartel was in power, and as Guzman worked his way up its ranks, it was involved in a lot of homicides, Vigil said.

Both the Guadalajara cartel and the Sinaloa cartel, a successor group led by Guzman, were responsible for the killing of "untold Americans, directly or indirectly," he added.

"Whether Chapo Guzman was involved or not, it's anybody's guess," Vigil said of the killings prosecutors are considering adding to the case. "But they do have these drug traffickers who are willing to testify."

The US federal government has said a number of cooperating witnesses, including Colombian drug traffickers, will testify "to prove Guzman's power" and "astonishing illegal profits." Through the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, or RICO, Act, prosecutors could link Guzman to the acts of others in his organization, Vigil said.

US prosecutors are "going to throw the kitchen sink and the entire bathroom at him," because they can't afford to lose the case, Vigil said, adding that may mean including "other traffickers whose credibility is not great."

SEE ALSO: The FBI just put the 'narco of narcos' on its 10 Most Wanted list

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The wives of El Chapo's henchmen reveal how they hid and spent $2 billion



source http://www.businessinsider.com/el-chapo-murder-us-citizens-dea-agent-us-prosecutors-2018-4

Ann Curry says she warned NBC about Matt Lauer's alleged sexual harassment in 2012 — 5 years before his firing

Matt lauer ann curry

  • Former "Today Show" cohost Ann Curry told The Washington Post this week that she warned NBC executives about sexual harassment from Matt Lauer in 2012.
  • Curry told The Post that she complained to two NBC executives after a female "Today Show" staff member told her that Lauer "sexually harassed her, physically."
  • An NBC spokesman told The Post that the network had no record of Curry's warning.

Former "Today Show" cohost Ann Curry told The Washington Post this week that she warned NBC executives about sexual harassment from Matt Lauer in 2012, five years before he was fired in November for alleged misconduct.

Curry told The Post that she complained to two NBC executives, whom she didn't name, after a female "Today Show" staff member told her that Lauer "sexually harassed her, physically."

"A woman approached me and asked me tearfully if I could help her," Curry said. "She was afraid of losing her job."

Curry said she didn't reveal the woman's name to NBC's management at the woman's request. "I told management they had a problem and they needed to keep an eye on him and how he deals with women," she said.

The NBC staffer confirmed to The Post that she went to Curry with her complaint, but asked that the publication not reveal her name.

An NBC spokesman told The Post that the network had no record of Curry's warning. NBC did not respond immediately to a request for further comment from Business Insider.

In January, Curry said on "CBS This Morning" that she was "not surprised by the allegations" that resulted in Lauer's firing, but she had not spoken publicly about what she specifically knew about Lauer's misconduct until she spoke to The Post this week.

Lauer responded for the first time to the allegations that resulted in his firing last year in the same Post article published Thursday.

"I fully acknowledge that I acted inappropriately as a husband, father and principal at NBC," Lauer said. "However I want to make it perfectly clear that any allegations or reports of coercive, aggressive or abusive actions on my part, at any time, are absolutely false." 

SEE ALSO: NBC host Matt Lauer fired for 'inappropriate sexual behavior' at work

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why Apple makes it so hard to get a new iPhone battery



source http://www.businessinsider.com/today-show-ann-curry-says-she-warned-nbc-about-matt-lauer-in-2012-2018-4

Thursday, April 26, 2018

Cosby says 'he doesn't own a plane' in a bizarre third-person rant after guilty verdict

bill cosby

  • Bill Cosby was found guilty on three counts of aggravated indecent assault in his sexual assault retrial on Thursday.
  • Cosby was ordered to remain in Pennsylvania after his prosecutors argued Cosby should be taken into custody immediately since he owned a private plane and could flee the state.
  • "He doesn't have a plane, you a--hole!," Cosby yelled in response, according to multiple reporters who attended the trial.


Bill Cosby gave a bizarre response after he was found guilty on all counts in his sexual assault retrial on Thursday.

Cosby was ordered to remain in Pennsylvania after his prosecutors argued Cosby should be taken into custody immediately since he owned a private plane and could flee the state.

"He doesn't have a plane, you a--hole!," Cosby yelled in response, according to multiple reporters who attended the trial.

While it's unclear if Cosby currently owns a private plane, he has been photographed boarding and departing private aircraft over the past few years.

In April, Cosby's defense lawyers presented logs from flights he took on a private jet in January 2004 in an attempt to prove Cosby hadn't been in his suburban Philadelphia mansion during the month he was accused of drugging and molesting a woman there.

On Thursday, Cosby was found guilty on three counts of aggravated indecent assault against Temple University employee Andrea Constand. Each count could send Cosby to prison for up to 10 years, though he is not likely to serve the maximum sentence. 

The conviction came after a two-week retrial that followed an earlier trial which failed to yield a verdict in June 2017. A mistrial was declared after jurors couldn't reach a unanimous decision.

While Cosby has been accused of sexual misconduct by over 60 women, this was the only allegation that became a criminal case.

SEE ALSO: Moving video shows women embracing and crying in courthouse after Bill Cosby's guilty verdict was announced

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Investors need to lower their expectations



source http://www.businessinsider.com/cosby-gives-bizarre-third-person-rant-after-guilty-verdict-2018-4

Watch the stand-up comedy clip that reignited the Bill Cosby sexual-assault allegations

hannibal buress bill cosby

  • Bill Cosby was found guilty on three counts of aggravated indecent assault in a Pennsylvania court on Thursday, and the comedian could face 1o years in prison for each count.
  • The sexual-assault allegations that brought Bill Cosby to trial were largely reignited by a stand-up comedy bit in 2014, when comedian Hannibal Buress joked about Cosby's "rape" at a comedy club in Philadelphia.
  • After footage of Buress' joke went viral, more than 60 women came forward to accuse Cosby of sexual abuse.


Bill Cosby, 80, was found guilty on three counts of aggravated indecent assault in a Pennsylvania court on Thursday, and the comedian could face up to 10 years in prison for each count.

The sexual-assault allegations that brought Cosby to trial were largely reignited by a stand-up comedy bit in 2014, when comedian Hannibal Buress joked about Cosby's "rape" at a club in Philadelphia.

"Pull your pants up black people, I was on TV in the '80s," Buress said in the bit, mocking Bill Cosby's public persona. "Yeah, but you rape women, Bill Cosby," Buress added, "so turn the crazy down a couple notches."

Shaky, fan-shot footage of Buress' Cosby joke subsequently went viral.

As Buress' joke went viral, Cosby was vilified by many on social media and the subject was picked up by and discussed frequently on cable news outlets like CNN. Cosby then faced persistent criticism from other notable comedians, including Judd Apatow.

In the years following Buress' joke, more than 60 women would come forward to accuse Cosby of sexual assault.

And on Thursday, Cosby was convicted of drugging and violating Temple University employee Andrea Constand at his suburban Philadelphia home in 2004. The verdict came after a two-week retrial in which prosecutors put five other women on the stand who testified that Cosby drugged and violated them, too.

It was the only criminal case to arise from allegations from his more than 60 accusers.

Additional reporting by the AP.

SEE ALSO: Judd Apatow skewers Bill Cosby while doing a perfect impression of him

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's the uncomfortable moment when Bill Cosby asked a journalist not to air part of an interview about allegations against him



source http://www.businessinsider.com/hannibal-buress-bill-cosby-joke-video-2018-4

Bill Cosby found guilty in sexual assault trial

bill cosby

  • Bill Cosby was found guilty in his sexual assault retrial in a Norristown, Pennsylvania court on Thursday.
  • Cosby, 80, was found guilty on three counts of aggravated indecent assault, for drugging and violating Temple University employee Andrea Constand at his suburban Philadelphia home in 2004.
  • The verdict came after a two-week retrial in which prosecutors put five other women on the stand who testified that Cosby drugged and violated them, too.
  • The conviction could put him in prison for up to 10 years on each count.

Bill Cosby was found guilty on all counts in his sexual assault retrial in a Norristown, Pennsylvania court on Thursday.

He was found guilty on three counts of aggravated indecent assault. The conviction could put him in prison for up to 10 years on each count. He is likely to get less than that under state sentencing guidelines, but given his age, even a modest term could mean he will die behind bars.

A jury panel of seven men and five women deliberated for around 14 hours before delivering the verdict. The guilty verdict came less than a year after another jury deadlocked on the charges.

Cosby was charged with drugging and violating Temple University employee Andrea Constand at his suburban Philadelphia home in 2004. Cosby claimed the encounter was consensual. His lawyer called Constand a "con artist" who leveled false accusations against Cosby so she could sue him. 

The verdict came after a two-week retrial in which prosecutors put five other women on the stand who testified that Cosby drugged and violated them, too. One of those women asked him through her tears, “You remember, don’t you, Mr. Cosby?”

Prosecutors used Cosby’s past admissions about drugs and sex as well as the testimony of the other women to help bolster accuser Andrea Constand’s allegations.

It was the only criminal case to arise from allegations from more than 60 women.

“The time for the defendant to escape justice is over,” prosecutor Stewart Ryan said in his closing argument. “It’s finally time for the defendant to dine on the banquet of his own consequences.”

AP reporting by Michael R. Sisak and Claudia Lauer.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The 3 key words to use on your résumé to land the interview



source http://www.businessinsider.com/bill-cosby-found-guilty-in-sexual-assault-trial-2018-4

Charlie Rose could reportedly host a show interviewing other high-profile men accused of sexual misconduct like Louis C.K. and Matt Lauer

charlie rose

  • Former CBS and PBS news anchor Charlie Rose, who was fired from both networks after he was accused of sexual misconduct last year, could reportedly host a new series interviewing other high-profile men accused of sexual misconduct.
  • Tina Brown, magazine industry luminary and women's advocate, told a Q&A crowd in New York this week that she was approached to work on the potential series but turned down the job, according to Page Six.
  • A source close to Brown told Page Six, "Tina said she’d just been e-mailed about co-hosting a new show with Charlie Rose, in which they’d interview Louis C.K. [and] Matt Lauer," both of whom were accused of sexual misconduct last year.
  • Brown confirmed to Page Six that she was approached to produce the series rather than co-host it, and she told the outlet she couldn't recall who was behind it.

Former CBS and PBS news anchor Charlie Rose, whose PBS series ("Charlie Rose") was cancelled after he was accused of sexual misconduct last year, could be hosting a new series interviewing other high-profile men who faced "MeToo" accusations. 

Tina Brown, magazine luminary and women's advocate, told a Q&A crowd at the Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy’s Women’s Luncheon this week that she was approached to work on the potential series but turned down the job, according to Page Six

"These guys are already planning their comebacks," Brown told the crowd. 

A source close to Brown told Page Six, "Tina said she’d just been e-mailed about co-hosting a new show with Charlie Rose, in which they’d interview Louis C.K. [and] Matt Lauer," both of whom were accused of sexual misconduct last year.

Brown confirmed to Page Six that she was approached to produce the series rather than co-host it, and she told the outlet she couldn't recall who was behind it.

Rose was accused of sexual misconduct by several women in November. The accusations included making unwanted sexual advances toward his employees, groping, explicit phone calls, and displays of nudity.

Representatives for Charlie Rose did not respond to a request for comment from Page Six and have not yet responded to a further request for comment from Business Insider.

SEE ALSO: Megyn Kelly reportedly has a $69 million contract with NBC — here's how that stacks up against other top TV hosts

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why Apple makes it so hard to get a new iPhone battery



source http://www.businessinsider.com/charlie-rose-could-host-show-interviewing-other-men-accused-of-sexual-misconduct-report-2018-4

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

The Supreme Court is finally hearing arguments on Trump's travel ban — here's what to expect

supreme court travel ban

  • President Donald Trump's travel ban is being argued before the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
  • The justices will decide whether Trump has the authority to broadly restrict travel, and whether the ban violates the Constitution's Establishment Clause.
  • The justices are expected to issue a ruling in June.

President Donald Trump's travel ban, one of the most controversial executive orders to come from his presidency so far, is being argued before the Supreme Court on Wednesday morning.

The court is considering the third iteration of Trump's ban, which he issued in September 2017, after lower courts struck down each of Trump's previous two versions.

The third ban imposed restrictions on travelers coming to the United States from eight countries: Syria, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, Chad, North Korea, and Venezuela. But the plaintiffs didn't include North Korea and Venezuela in their challenge, and the Trump administration removed Chad from the list in recent weeks.

At issue are two main questions:

  1. whether Trump has the authority under federal immigration law to implement such travel restrictions, and
  2. whether or not the travel ban violates the Constitution's Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over the other.

The Supreme Court will post audio of the oral arguments on its website Wednesday afternoon, a rarity because the case is so high-profile. The justices are expected to issue a ruling in June.

What the Trump administration is arguing

trump new travel banThe Trump administration has argued, as it did with the previous two travel bans, that Trump has "broad authority" to restrict travel to the country over national security and terrorism concerns.

It has also argued that the ban does not discriminate against Muslims, as it includes two countries without majority-Muslim populations: North Korea and Venezuela.

Attorneys for the Trump administration have argued that the travel ban has precedent — previous presidents have issued executive orders that restricted travel from certain countries during international conflicts or other national security crises.

The government cited decisions from former presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, who restricted travel from Iran during the hostage crisis in 1980 and from Cuba in 1985, respectively.

The Trump administration has also argued that it imposed the travel restrictions not to punish countries or discriminate against their citizens, but to "encourage" the nations to improve their data collection practices on their travelers.

What the challengers are arguing

travel ban

The challengers — which include the state of Hawaii, the Muslim Association of Hawaii, and two unidentified plaintiffs — have argued that Trump's third version of the ban essentially does the same as the previous two: discriminates against Muslim travelers in an effort to fulfill Trump's 2016 campaign promise to bar Muslims from entering the country.

Plaintiffs have also cited not only the previous two travel bans, but Trump's 2016 campaign rhetoric, and multiple tweets since the beginning of his presidency that they argue exhibit Trump's religious animosity toward Muslims.

Lower courts, including two federal appeals courts, have generally sided with the plaintiffs in ruling that Trump's travel ban has been similar in its intention and implementation to the first two travel bans, which barred nationals of majority-Muslim countries from entering the US.

US District Court Judge Derrick Watson, for instance, wrote in an early opinion that Trump's third travel ban would cause "irreparable harm" and violate federal immigration law were it to take effect.

"[The travel ban] suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor: it lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be 'detrimental to the interests of the United States,'" Watson wrote, adding that the ban "plainly discriminates based on nationality."

But one recurring question the challengers have faced — and will likely face on Wednesday — has been whether the plaintiffs adequately demonstrated to the courts that Trump has exceeded his lawful authority in implementing the ban.

The challengers concede that the Immigration and Nationality Act grants the president broad powers to restrict the entry of certain travelers, but they have argued that the Trump administration has "grossly" exceeded its authority by placing indefinite restrictions on a group of countries that comprises roughly 150 million people.

SEE ALSO: The Trump administration just released new photos of 'the president's border wall' — and it looks more like a fence

DON'T MISS: Nearly 2,000 people were stopped in 9 days under Trump's travel ban — and almost all of them were legal US residents

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 3 reasons why North and South Korean reunification is unlikely



source http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-travel-ban-supreme-court-arguments-2018-4

Spanish police made their largest bust of cocaine ever — hidden in a shipment of bananas

Spain police cocaine drug bust

  • Spanish police found nearly 9 metric tons of cocaine hidden in a shipment of bananas.
  • The shipment was the largest ever found by Spanish police and the most found in a shipping container in Europe.
  • Spain is a major transshipment point for drugs entering Europe.

Spanish police have made a record cocaine seizure, finding 8,740 kilos of the drug hidden among 1,080 boxes of bananas in a shipping container at the southern port of Algeciras.

The container was imported by a Colombian company, the Spanish national police said in a statement. It arrived in Spain on a ship from the Colombian port of Turbo, on the Caribbean coast in the northern state of Antioquia. 

The stash was the largest ever seized by Spanish police and the largest quantity found in a single shipping container in Europe, the statement said. Six people had been arrested in relation to the find. Two were detained in Lyon, France, one in Algeciras, and three in Malaga, where police also seized two vehicles and a truck. The case is still open, according to the statement.

"The magnificent work of the security forces and bodies in the fight against drug trafficking makes it possible for numerous seizures to take place," Interior Minister Juan Ignacio Zoido said. "But today's is not just one more [seizure], because we are talking about the largest apprehension of cocaine in a container made up to now in Europe."

Spain Algeciras cocaine drug bust

Customs did not say when the bust was made though the shipment was last inspected by police on Sunday, according to the statement.

The bust tops a high-seas seizure of 7.6 metric tons of cocaine made in 1999, and the operation follows a bust in December of 6 metric tons of cocaine also in Algeciras, the Mediterranean's largest port and a transshipment hub used by firms to unload cargo and redistribute it in Europe or the Middle East.

Drug seizures involving shipping containers have increased considerably in recent years, rising sixfold between 2006 and 2016, according to the European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction. And bananas have been a particularly popular product in which to hide the illicit cargo.

In July 2016, prosecutors in Romania found 2.3 tons of cocaine hidden in crates of bananas from Colombia and other countries. In September 2016, police in Spain intercepted nearly 2,000 pounds of cocaine hidden in a commercial shipment of bananas from Colombia that arrived in Algeciras. In March 2017, Spanish police in Malaga and Valencia seized 37.5 pounds of cocaine — 15 pounds of which was hidden inside fake bananas made of resin. In April last year, German police intercepted what they believed to be 847 pounds of cocaine in a shipment of bananas that arrived in Hamburg from Ecuador.

(Reporting for Reuters by Paul Day; editing by Julien Toyer and Angus MacSwan)

SEE ALSO: A recent cocaine bust in Central America hints at a shift in drug smugglers' strategy

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what $1 billion worth of cocaine looks like



source http://www.businessinsider.com/r-spanish-police-make-record-cocaine-bust-in-algeciras-port-2018-4

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

Instagram is rolling out a feature that will let you download all of your photos and past searches in one fell swoop

Instagram Phone Logo

  • Two weeks ago, Instagram announced it would roll out a data download feature that would let users pull all content they published to the platform in a downloadable template.
  • Instagram confirmed to Business Insider that the feature is now available on the web only, with a steady rollout to Android and iPhone users in the works.
  • The move comes a month before the EU's new GDPR privacy laws that will in part require tech companies to provide a way for consumers to download content from platforms.

Following Facebook's implementation of a feature that lets users download their information in bulk, Instagram is rolling out a similar feature.

Originally reported by TechCrunch, Instagram announced this feature two weeks ago, but confirmed to Business Insider on Tuesday that the tool is available for users on the web for now through this link. Android and iPhone users won't be able to use the feature in the app immediately, but will soon.

Here's a look at what the Data Download tool looks like on the web:

Instagram screen shot data download

Your Instagram photos, videos, comments, past searches, direct messages, Stories in your archive and profile information will be available to export, but it may take up to 48 hours. The data will be sent to the email connected to your account in a file, in a Microsoft Excel, Web, Notes or Text format, that will be available through a link.

Instagram data download feature

Comments and likes on others' posts are included in the download, as is the username of those posts' owners which is public information.

Instagram's data download feature comes a month before the European Union implements its new privacy law, GDPR, which will require tech companies be more transparent with how they use European consumer data, regardless of where these companies are headquartered.

Another part of the law requires these companies provide users with the personal data they use on platforms in a downloadable document. That means the Data Download tool Instagram is rolling out to its users is a last-minute move to comply with the regulation, which takes effect on May 25. 

Tech companies, specifically social networking sites, have been criticized for keeping users tethered to their platforms by not providing a way to download data en masse. This Data Download tool will make it easier for users to gather their data from Instagram in one fell swoop.

Before this tool, the only way to save content that users only published on Instagram was through the tedious task of going through each post in a user's archive and saving them to the camera roll. Instagram's Data Download tool will serve two purposes: It gives users a way out of the platform with all of their data in tow, but it also gives users who wish to stay an easy way of downloading content that they initially only published to Instagram.

SEE ALSO: Here's how to use the new Instagram photo 'Focus' feature that brings the best part of the iPhone X to any smartphone

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How a tiny camera startup is taking on Amazon and Google



source http://www.businessinsider.com/instagram-data-download-feature-gdpr-privacy-photos-searches-2018-4

The remains of Yahoo just got hit with a $35 million fine because it didn't tell investors about Russian hacking (AABA)

Marissa Mayer

  • In 2014, Yahoo was hacked by a state-sponsored actor, which as been identified as Russia.
  • Investors didn't learn until last year, when Yahoo was bought by Verizon.
  • The SEC fined Altaba, the holding company that owns the remains of Yahoo, for not properly considering whether to inform investors at the time.  

The SEC announced on Tuesday that Altaba, the holding company that owns the remnants of Yahoo, must pay a $35 million fine to settle charges that it misled investors over hacking events in 2014. 

Although Yahoo's information security team knew about Russian hackers stealing usernames, email addresses, and other key user data, the company never "adequately considered" whether it needed to disclose the breach to investors, according to the release

It was eventually disclosed when Verizon bought Yahoo last year. 

This SEC judgment is related to a 2014 hack in which over 500 million user account credentials were stolen. 

Yahoo also admitted last fall that all 3 billion user accounts had data stolen in a separate August 2013 hack, which would make it one of the largest of all times, edging out the 2014 hack that's the subject of the SEC settlement. 

“We do not second-guess good faith exercises of judgment about cyber-incident disclosure. But we have also cautioned that a company’s response to such an event could be so lacking that an enforcement action would be warranted. This is clearly such a case,” said Steven Peikin, Co-Director of the SEC Enforcement Division, in a statement.

An investor relations contact for Altaba didn't respond to an emailed request for comment. 

Read the entire SEC release below: 


The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that the entity formerly known as Yahoo! Inc. has agreed to pay a $35 million penalty to settle charges that it misled investors by failing to disclose one of the world’s largest data breaches in which hackers stole personal data relating to hundreds of millions of user accounts.

According to the SEC’s order, within days of the December 2014 intrusion, Yahoo’s information security team learned that Russian hackers had stolen what the security team referred to internally as the company’s “crown jewels”: usernames, email addresses, phone numbers, birthdates, encrypted passwords, and security questions and answers for hundreds of millions of user accounts. Although information relating to the breach was reported to members of Yahoo’s senior management and legal department, Yahoo failed to properly investigate the circumstances of the breach and to adequately consider whether the breach needed to be disclosed to investors. The fact of the breach was not disclosed to the investing public until more than two years later, when in 2016 Yahoo was in the process of closing the acquisition of its operating business by Verizon Communications, Inc.

“We do not second-guess good faith exercises of judgment about cyber-incident disclosure. But we have also cautioned that a company’s response to such an event could be so lacking that an enforcement action would be warranted. This is clearly such a case,” said Steven Peikin, Co-Director of the SEC Enforcement Division.

Jina Choi, Director of the SEC's San Francisco Regional Office, added, “Yahoo’s failure to have controls and procedures in place to assess its cyber-disclosure obligations ended up leaving its investors totally in the dark about a massive data breach. Public companies should have controls and procedures in place to properly evaluate cyber incidents and disclose material information to investors.”

The SEC’s order finds that when Yahoo filed several quarterly and annual reports during the two-year period following the breach, the company failed to disclose the breach or its potential business impact and legal implications. Instead, the company’s SEC filings stated that it faced only the risk of, and negative effects that might flow from, data breaches. In addition, the SEC’s order found that Yahoo did not share information regarding the breach with its auditors or outside counsel in order to assess the company’s disclosure obligations in its public filings. Finally, the SEC’s order finds that Yahoo failed to maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that reports from Yahoo’s information security team concerning cyber breaches, or the risk of such breaches, were properly and timely assessed for potential disclosure.

Verizon acquired Yahoo’s operating business in June 2017. Yahoo has since changed its name to Altaba Inc.

Yahoo neither admitted nor denied the findings in the SEC's order, which requires the company to cease and desist from further violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13, and 13a-15.

The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, has been conducted by Tracy S. Combs of the Cyber Unit and supervised by Jennifer J. Lee and Erin E. Schneider of the San Francisco office.

Earlier this year, the SEC adopted a statement and interpretive guidance to assist public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents.

 

SEE ALSO: 9 reasons you should buy an iPhone 7 instead of the iPhone X

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Google, Apple, and Amazon are in a war that no one will win



source http://www.businessinsider.com/yahoo-hack-35-million-sec-fine-for-not-telling-investors-about-russian-hack-2018-4

Monday, April 23, 2018

Violence in Mexico is still setting records — and the embattled president just reached a grisly milestone

Tijuana Baja California Mexico soldiers police crime scene

  • Deadly violence continued to rise in Mexico in March.
  • The number of homicides that month helped the current government reach an ignominious distinction.
  • Rising crime levels come as the country gears up for national elections this summer.


The number of intentional homicide cases in Mexico went up in March, with 2,346 cases. The new figures ends two consecutive months of declines and rounds out the most violent first quarter of a year on record.

But the March total also constitutes a more ignominious distinction for the government of President Enrique Peña Nieto. The 104,583 homicide cases registered since he took office in December 2012 are more than the 102,859 officially recorded under his predecessor, Felipe Calderon, who deployed military personnel around the country to confront organized-crime and drug-related violence.

Homicide cases can contain more than one victim, and Mexican government data recorded 2,729 victims during March, the most on record for that month, according to Animal Politico. The January-March 2018 total was 6,553 homicide cases, a new record, and 7,667 homicide victims, which works out to about 85 victims a day, or three to four every hour.

The number of annual homicides declined during the first years of Peña Nieto's term, falling from peak years in the latter half of Calderon's time in office.

Homicides in Mexico

But Peña Nieto has overseen steady increases in deadly violence in recent years.

The number of homicide cases in the country rose 25% between 2015 and 2016. 2017 saw a 23% increase over 2016.

The country's homicide rate has also risen steadily over the past three years, from 13.34 per 100,000 people in 2015, to 16.50 in 2016, to 20.16 in 2017.

Crime and violence is getting worse in Mexico

Much of this violence has been driven by fragmentation in the criminal underworld.

Large cartels have broken down in recent years. The killing or capture of cartel figureheads has frequently led to competitors jockeying to fill leadership voids and seize control of trafficking territory and other criminal enterprises.

Smaller groups are less able to carry out transnational criminal activity like drug trafficking and often shift to regional drug production or trafficking or focus on small-scale crimes, like extortion — all of which drives up violence at the local level. (Rampant criminal activity is facilitated by widespread corruption and high levels of impunity.)

The uptick in deadly violence and other crimes has also affected the mood among Mexicans, the majority of whom say they feel unsafe in the country's major cities.

According to a survey done by the country's national statistical agency during the first half of March, 76.8% of residents in Mexico's 55 largest cities reported feeling insecure — the highest percentage recorded since the survey began in September 2013 and a slight increase over the last result, which was 75.9% in December.

Nearly two-thirds of respondents said they had heard of or seen robberies or assaults around their homes during the first quarter of the year. Just over 44% said they had seen or heard of the sale or use of drugs around their homes during that period, while 40% reported frequent gunfire.

More than 72% of those polled said they expected crime in their city to remain the same or worsen in the next 12 months.

Mexico City marine soldier crime scene

Rising crime and growing pessimism about security come as Mexico approaches nationwide elections on July 1. Some 3,400 elected positions are up for grabs, including the presidency.

Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, leftist former mayor of Mexico City and a two-time presidential contender, has a commanding lead — 22 percentage points, according to one poll — buoyed in part by widespread dissatisfaction with the country's direction and the leadership of Peña Nieto and his center-right Institutional Revolutionary Party.

The country's economy — which many citizens view as underperforming — widespread insecurity, and rampant corruption loom large over the election, though the leading candidates have offered little in the way of specifics about how they would address those issues, according to James Bosworth, founder of political-risk-analysis firm Hxagon.

"If you look at these candidates, they're not really debating the nuances of economic policy. They're not debating the nuances of security policy," Bosworth told Business Insider earlier in April.

Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador

"There's not some sort of clear divide among the candidates in terms of how they would manage security," he said, adding that there was "really not a clear set of promises that differentiate one candidate from the other."

"Over half of Mexican voters believe that the economy is in crisis, and a larger number of voters ... believe that security in their town has degraded in the last six years," Bosworth said.

"Personal security is different from the big cartel wars that the media write about," he added. "Personal security is your ability to walk down the street without being mugged or being caught in a firefight from two local gangs, and people's personal security has really declined."

Lopez Obrador emerged largely unscathed from the first presidential debate of this election, held Sunday night, despite concerted efforts by his opponents to attack him.

Lopez Obrador said nothing new during the debate, though he did again qualify an earlier suggestion about amnesty for criminal activity, stressing that "amnesty doesn't mean impunity" and that the government has to address the causes of insecurity and violence — "in particular, reducing poverty."

Reaction to the debate was dominated by surprise and anger over comments from Jamie Rodriguez, an independent candidate added to the race despite a large number of invalidated signatures collected in support of his candidacy.

"We have to cut off the hands of those who rob. It's that simple," Rodriguez said during discussion of corruption, adding that he would ask Congress to pass a law backing the idea. A moderator, surprised by the comment, asked him he was being literal.

"That's right. That's right," he replied. "Literally," he added, making a chopping motion with his hand.

SEE ALSO: Violence is high in Mexico's most popular tourist destinations — but some groups are more at risk

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The wives of El Chapo's henchmen reveal how they hid and spent $2 billion



source http://www.businessinsider.com/mexico-violence-homicides-under-pena-nieto-2018-4

These are the 10 US states with the weakest gun laws in 2017

louisiana shooting

The US experienced another mass shooting on Sunday when a man entered a Waffle House in Nashville, Tennessee and opened fire, killing four people before a bystander heroically disarmed him. 

In terms of strict state gun laws, Tennessee falls in the middle of the pack, according to the Giffords Law Center's Annual Gun Law Scorecard. In 2017, the Giffords Law Center ranked the state as having the 26th least strict gun laws in the US.

The Giffords Gun Law Scorecard's methodology is based on nine different broad categories of laws, such as background checks, gun sales, and who can have a gun.

"We assign points to different policies ... and they're somewhat graduated based on the strength of the policy," Laura Cutilletta, legal director at the Giffords Law Center, told Business Insider.

"We also take away points if a state has something particularly dangerous, like letting guns in bars," Cutilletta said, adding that they then "add everything up, and we assign grades based on the points total."

"Probably the most important part is we compare that to death rate in every state," Cutilletta said, "and we find that there is a strong correlation between states with stronger gun laws and having lower gun death rates."

Here are the 10 states with the weakest gun laws in 2017:

SEE ALSO: History of the AR-15 and why it's used in so many mass shootings

10. Vermont

Gun death rate: 11 per 100,000 (36th lowest in the US). 

Cutilletta noted that Vermont might move up in the rankings, given that they just passed a number of stricter gun laws in 2018 already. 



9. Kentucky

Gun death rate: 17.5 per 100,000 (13th highest in the US). 



8. Louisiana

Gun death rate: 21.2 per 100,000 (3rd highest in the US). 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source http://www.businessinsider.com/us-states-weakest-gun-laws-2018-4

An AR-15 was found at the scene of the deadly Waffle House shooting — here's how it became the weapon of choice for America's mass shooters

ar-15 rifle

Parkland, Florida.

Las Vegas, Nevada. 

Sutherland Springs, Texas.

Recent deadly mass shootings in these US cities have at least one thing in common: the AR-15. The weapon was discovered again at the scene of Sunday's deadly shooting at a Tennessee Waffle House, as suspect Travis Reinking remains on the run.

This weapon has become increasingly popular in the US, especially since the 1994 federal weapons ban expired in 2004, and has been used in many other mass shootings around the country. Not just the three listed above.

To understand how and why this has happened, we put together a historical overview of the weapon and spoke with David Chipman, a senior policy analyst at Giffords and former special agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.

The National Rifle Association did not respond to our request for comment.

SEE ALSO: A 15-year-old JROTC cadet sacrificed himself to save 'dozens' during the Florida shooting — and thousands of people want him buried with full military honors

The AR in AR-15 stands for Armalite Rifle — not assault rifle.

In the mid-1950s, the US Army asked a gun-manufacturing company called Armalite to develop a smaller version of the AR-10 to replace the M-1 Garand, which had been widely used in World War II and the Korean War.

The result was the AR-15.

But Armalite then sold the design to Colt, which in turn began selling the weapon to Pentagon. In 1962, the US Department of Defense changed the name of the AR-15 to the M-16.



In 1963, Colt began marketing the AR-15 to the American public as a "superb hunting partner."

While it was still legal for gun dealers to sell automatic weapons until the 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act, which banned new automatic weapons, these first Colt AR-15s were semi-automatic weapons.

An automatic continuously fires when the trigger is held down, whereas the operator must continuously pull the trigger to repeatedly fire a semi-automatic weapon.

However, to this day, civilians can still own automatic weapons that were grandfathered in before 1986.



And, even then, the AR-15 was incredibly lethal.

It shoots a .223 Caliber or 5.56 mm round at roughly 3,300 feet per second, which is about three times the muzzle velocity of a typical Glock pistol.

The AR-15's effective firing range is also more than 1,300 feet at the least, whereas a typical Glock's firing range is just over 160 feet.

Chipman, the senior policy analyst at Giffords and former ATF special agent, told Business Insider that the AR-15 is so powerful that they weren't allowed to carry it during indoor raids because the rounds travel so fast that they could penetrate a victim, then a wall, then a bystander through that room.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source http://www.businessinsider.com/ar-15-semi-automatic-history-why-used-mass-shootings-2018-2

Sunday, April 22, 2018

Florida police failed to unlock phone using a dead man's finger — but corpses may still help in hacking handsets

man with mobile phone

  • Police in Largo, Florida, went to a funeral home to press a dead man's finger against his phone in a failed attempt to unlock the handset.
  • This was not the first attempt by police in the United States to unlock a phone in this way.
  • Other tech options exist for law enforcement to hack phones that don't require corpses.  

Two officers of the Largo Police Department in Florida arrived at a funeral home recently and asked to see the body of a man shot dead last month. They then proceeded with the gruesome duty of trying to unlock the man's mobile phone with his lifeless finger, according to a published report.

The policemen failed to open the phone belonging to 30-year old Linus Phillip, according to a report Friday in The Tampa Bay Times.

The newspaper reported that police wanted to search the handset as part of the inquiry into Phillip's death, as well as a separate drug-related investigation. A Largo police officer shot Phillip after he tried to evade arrest and nearly hit the policeman with his car, according to reports. A representative from Largo PD, located about 25 miles west of Tampa, did not respond to Business Insider's interview request.

A lot of legal and ethical questions are raised here, including whether or not police should treat the dead this way. Phillip's fiancee Victoria Armstrong said she felt violated and disrespected by the officers' actions, the Associated Press reported.

Another question, that at least those who follow technology might ask, is: what made police think that the finger of a corpse would open the phone? This wasn't the first attempt of its kind in the United States.

In November 2016, police in Ohio pressed the bloodied finger of Abdul Razak Ali Artan to his iPhone after he injured more than a dozen people at Ohio State University by stabbing and ramming his car into them, according to a report last month in Forbes. In that case too, the dead man's finger failed to open the phone.

Though it's not clear what brand of phone Phillip owned, Engadget years ago concluded that a finger from a corpse would not unlock an iPhone.

The Touch ID system uses two methods to sense and identify a fingerprint, capacitive and radio frequency. "A capacitive sensor is activated by the slight electrical charge running through your skin," wrote Engadget in 2013. "We all have a small amount of electrical current running through our bodies, and capacitive technology utilizes that to sense touch."

And the radio frequency waves in an iPhone sensor would also not open unless living tissue was present.

But according to the same story in Forbes, a workaround may be possible. The magazine quoted unnamed law-enforcement sources who indicated that police in Ohio and New York have found a way to hack a phone using a dead person's fingerprints. Unclear is whether the police already had the fingerprints on file or whether they obtained them from the bodies. 

Forbes' sources said "it was now relatively common for fingerprints of the deceased to be depressed on the scanner of Apple iPhones."  

And police in Largo might have also contacted companies, such as Cellebrite or GrayShift. They reportedly have the ability to hack into phones without handling corpses.

Regardless of whether police have the legal right to use a dead person's body to open a phone, they might be better served to exhaust some of the other technological options first.

SEE ALSO: Shadowy hacking industry may be helping FBI crack an iPhone

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why Apple makes it so hard to get a new iPhone battery



source http://www.businessinsider.com/florida-police-fail-to-unlock-phone-using-dead-mans-finger-2018-4

We spent 3 nights in the NYC underbelly with a crime reporter to see how safe the 'safest big city' in the US really is

IMG_1673

In 1990, after a record high 2,262 homicides, some called New York City the "murder capital" of the country. But since then, the murder rate has steadily declined.

The Big Apple is on pace this year to record fewer homicides than the record low of 333 set in 2014, the New York Daily News reported in early September.

Some have even dubbed today's NYC "the safest big city" in the US.

To get a better sense of what NYC's streets are like these days, we spent three nights with NY Daily News crime reporter Kerry Burke, considered by many to be the best in the city.

Burke, 55, reported from ground zero on 9/11, helped break the Eric Garner story, and was even on a few episodes of Bravo's "Tabloid Wars" in 2006. He said he had been to roughly four shootings a week since he started the job 16 years ago.

The first night we spent with Kerry passed with few incidents — perhaps a sign of the safer times. But the last two nights told a different story.

Here's what we saw.

SEE ALSO: I spent the weekend with a homeless community in New York to see what it's really like to live on the streets

DON'T MISS: I covered murders during Chicago's deadliest year in decades — here's what I saw

Night 1: I met Burke in the Bronx while he was trying to find a man who had just been acquitted on murder charges.

"How are ya, Mr. Brown?" he said in a Boston accent.

Burke, who grew up in Boston's Dorchester housing projects, was rather formal at first, but switched right away to "bro" or "brotha," like he called almost every other guy I met with him.

He filled me in on the details about the man he was looking for before we walked to the guy's last known address.

Residents in the building told him the man no longer lived there, so Burke asked people in other buildings and nearby stores whether they knew him.

"Bodegas are the best," he said. "They know everything that goes on in the neighborhood, and they know everybody."



He walked into one unlocked neighboring apartment building and knocked on doors.

Burke was adept at talking to and gaining the trust of all different sorts of people, and he stressed the importance of being polite.

"Maybe it's because I'm a troubled Catholic that I always say thank you," Burke said, adding that he "might have to come back" to get more information too.

After about an hour or so, Burke was able to get the man's phone number but was unable to reach him.

He later heard that a murder suspect was being questioned at the 32nd precinct and decided to go wait outside in the hopes of getting a statement when the suspect walked out.



Around 11 p.m., the suspect's cousin walked out of the precinct. Burke asked him a few questions but didn't get much.

Throughout the eight hours I spent with Burke that first night, there were no homicides and only one shooting — a man hit in the buttocks.

The victim was immediately stabilized, and since the incident was not serious and happened more than an hour away from us, we didn't go.

I took the lack of homicides or serious shootings during Burke's shift — especially given it was a Friday night — as a good sign. But it was only the first night.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source http://www.businessinsider.com/how-safe-is-new-york-city-murder-rate-shadowing-nyc-crime-reporter-2017-10