Tuesday, January 30, 2018

A congressman demanded Capitol Police arrest and deport the 'Dreamers' invited to the State of the Union

paul gosar

  • A Republican Congressman said he asked Capitol Police to arrest and deport unauthorized immigrants attending Tuesday's State of the Union address as guests.
  • Many of the immigrants attending are already protected from deportation by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, but it's possible some are not.


Rep. Paul Gosar, an Arizona Republican, said Tuesday he asked Capitol Police and the Attorney General to arrest and deport any unauthorized immigrants attending President Donald Trump's State of the Union address.

A representative wrote on Gosar's Twitter account that the congressman had asked the authorities to "consider checking identification" of all attendees and arrest anyone using fraudulent social security numbers and identification.

"Of all the places where the Rule of Law needs to be enforced, it should be in the hallowed halls of Congress," Gosar said. "Any illegal aliens attempting to go through security, under any pretext of invitation or otherwise, should be arrested and deported."

Dozens of Democrats and at least one Republican have invited young unauthorized immigrants, often called "Dreamers," to the event as guests — a jab at Trump, who is terminating the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that protects them from deportation.

But it's unclear whether Gosar's threats have any weight.

The Dreamers attending the event likely still hold valid identification, social security numbers, and DACA protections that shield them from deportation for the time being.

It is possible that some Democrats may have invited unauthorized immigrants who are not DACA recipients, aides who helped organize the event told The Washington Post.

Beyond that, the Capitol Police has no authority to enforce federal immigration law. Capitol Police did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

Lawmakers quickly began condemning Gosar's tweets Tuesday afternoon.

"What's wrong with you?" Rep. Joe Crowley, a New York Democrat, said on Twitter.

"This is why we can't have nice things…" Sen. Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican, added.

SEE ALSO: Trump is dead-set on ending 'chain migration' in the immigration deal — here's what it is

DON'T MISS: Trump's radical push to scale back legal immigration is becoming a key flashpoint in Congress

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A Georgetown professor explains how Martin Luther King Jr. 'has been severely whitewashed'



source http://www.businessinsider.com/congressman-demands-capitol-police-deport-dreamers-sotu-2018-1

FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe was forced out of office — here are all the casualties of the Trump administration so far

BI Graphics_Cabinet Resignations

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe stepped down on Monday, after repeatedly coming into conflict with President Donald Trump over the bureau's probe into Hillary Clinton's email server.

The administration has been rocked by a series of high-profile exits — including Sean Spicer as press secretary and James Comey as FBI director — since President Donald Trump took office in January.

Here are the top-level people who've either been fired or resigned from the administration, and why they left:

SEE ALSO: FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was reportedly forced out amid Trump's attacks

DON'T MISS: MEET THE CABINET: Here's who Trump has appointed to senior leadership positions

Andrew McCabe

FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe was forced to step down on Monday, after FBI Director Christopher Wray raised concerns about an upcoming Justice Department inspector general report examining McCabe's and other senior officials' actions during the 2016 presidential campaign. Trump had been increasingly vocal about his criticism of McCabe before his ouster.

McCabe served as the acting FBI director for a period of time in 2017 after Trump fired James Comey from the position. He began his career at the FBI in 1996.



Omarosa Manigault

Omarosa Manigault, the director of communications for the White House's Office of Public Liaison, will have her official last day on January 20.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders announced on Wednesday that Manigault was leaving to "pursue other opportunities."

Trump fired Manigault twice on her two seasons appearing on his television show, "The Apprentice."



Tom Price

The secretary of health and human services had elicited bipartisan condemnation over the cost of his air travel — he had cost taxpayers more than $1 million between his use of private planes for domestic travel and military jets for recent trips to Africa, Europe, and Asia, Politico reported.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source http://www.businessinsider.com/who-has-trump-fired-so-far-james-comey-sean-spicer-michael-flynn-2017-7

The Department of Justice is reportedly investigating the Apple software update that slowed down older iPhones (AAPL)

Tim Cook angry sad

The United States Department of Justice and the Securites and Exchange Committee have started investigating an Apple software update that slows down older iPhones, according to a Bloomberg report

Apple admitted late last year than an iPhone software update issued in February 2017 slowed down the processors on certain older devices. The company said it was to prevent unexpected shutdowns in devices with older batteries. 

The reported DOJ and SEC probes wouldn't be the first pushes for more information from Apple. Groups in both the Senate and the House of Representatives have questioned Apple, and the company faces over 45 class-action lawsuits from consumers

Apple wasn't immediately available to comment. "We don’t confirm or deny investigations," said a spokesperson for the Department of Justice.

Apple previously said that it plans to release a new software update that will allow iPhone users to turn off the feature that diminished performance later this spring.

SEE ALSO: Tim Cook says Apple told users it was slowing their iPhones, but adds, 'I don't think a lot of people were paying attention'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The end of the iPhone X cycle could send Apple's stock tumbling



source http://www.businessinsider.com/united-states-reportedly-investigating-apple-battery-issues-2018-1

'Fast and Furious' movies might cause hyped-up audiences to drive too fast, according to a NYT study of speeding tickets

furious 7

  • "The Fast and the Furious" may cause an increase in speeding, according to a New York Times study of traffic tickets in Montgomery County, Maryland. 
  • The study found increases in average speed in tickets for the weekends following the releases of three "Fast and Furious" movies, as well as increases in "extreme speeding."

 

"The Fast and the Furious" franchise has notably driven hoards of people to the theaters (as one of the most successful movie franchises in history), but it may also be leading people to drive faster than they normally would, according to a new study published in The New York Times on Tuesday.

The Times study, led by Anupam B. Jena, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School, found that "rates of extreme speeding" increased in a sample county following the releases of three "Fast and Furious" movies.

The study examined 192,892 speeding tickets recorded in Montgomery County, Maryland, between 2012 and 2017. It found that, in the three weekends after the release of a "Fast and Furious" movie, compared to the three weekends before, ticketed speeds increased almost 20 percent, "to an average of 19 miles per hour over the speed limit, from 16 miles per hour." 

"Extreme speeding" also increased drastically in the same manner, according to the study, as "the percentage of drivers charged with driving more than 40 miles per hour above the speed limit nearly doubled." The study found extreme speeders were often also concentrated within two miles from movie theaters, which they say suggests speeding "induced by moviegoing."

Though the scope of the study is limited, the article makes for an entertaining read on the possible effects of a franchise that remains relevant on a large scale. 

"The Fate of the Furious," the eighth and latest movie in the series, earned over $1.2 billion worldwide after its release last summer. The release of the ninth film in the series has been delayed a year to April 2020. 

SEE ALSO: 'Fast and Furious' movie delayed until 2020 - Business Insider

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what losing weight does to your body and brain



source http://www.businessinsider.com/fast-and-furious-movies-may-cause-an-increase-in-speeding-study-2018-1

The richest man in the Middle East has been released from house arrest in Saudi Arabia — see the luxurious Ritz Carlton where he was held captive for months

The Ritz-Carlton, Riyadh

• Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered at least 11 princes — along with numerous ministers — to be arrested in November.

• Billionaire Alwaleed bin Talal, the richest man in the Middle East, according to Forbes, was among them.

• The prisoners are currently being held in the five-star Ritz-Carlton Riyadh in Saudi Arabia's capital city.

• Prince Alwaleed was released from custody Saturday, and told Reuters that he hasn't been charged with a crime following his months-long detention.



The unusual captivity of the richest man in the Middle East has come to a close.

Billionaire Alwaleed bin Talal was freed Saturday, NPR reported. He'd been a prisoner in the five-star Ritz-Carlton Riyadh since November 4, 2017, when Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman consolidated power by having 11 princes and numerous government ministers seized.

These captives received better accommodations than a standard prison cell. The royal and non-royal prisoners were reportedly confined to the luxury hotel in the nation's capital.

Prince Alwaleed even saw his fortune increase by $1 billion in the wake of his release, CNN reported. Forbes now puts his net worth at $18.3 billion.

The billionaire gave Reuters an interview in the suite where he'd been held for months. He said he was upset about the rumors that he was held in a standard jail and tortured. He said his arrest resulted through a "misunderstanding," and added that he spent his captivity watching the news, taking walks, swimming, and exercising.

"It's no problem at all," he said. "Everything's fine."

Here's a look at the luxury hotel before it was converted into an makeshift prison months ago:

SEE ALSO: Saudi Arabia had a crazy weekend that upended the Middle Eastern kingdom

The hotel first opened in 2011 and was the first ever Ritz-Carlton in Saudi Arabia.

Source: Five Star Alliance



It boasts 493 guest rooms, including 49 two-bedroom royal suites and 50 one-bedroom executive suites.

Source: Five Star Alliance



Amenities include a male-only spa, 62,000 square feet of event space, and a bowling alley.

Source: The Ritz-Carlton RiyadhThe Ritz-Carlton RiyadhThe Ritz-Carlton Riyadh



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source http://www.businessinsider.com/saudi-arabia-princes-ritz-carlton-prisoners-2017-11

Monday, January 29, 2018

'America needs you': James Comey sends a heartfelt message to Andrew McCabe and other FBI officials

James Comey

  • Former FBI director James Comey gave a message of support to former deputy director Andrew McCabe on Monday night.
  • McCabe stepped down from his post earlier in the day amid reports of an internal investigation and mounting criticism against the FBI.


Former FBI director James Comey gave a message of support to deputy director Andrew McCabe, following his resignation earlier on Monday.

"Special Agent Andrew McCabe stood tall over the last 8 months, when small people were trying to tear down an institution we all depend on," Comey said in a tweet. "He served with distinction for two decades. I wish Andy well.

"I also wish continued strength for the rest of the FBI," Comey continued. "America needs you."

McCabe's resignation comes amid a new report that FBI director Christopher Wray had informed him of an upcoming inspector general report on the department's handling of an investigation into then-secretary of state Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server. The FBI has been criticized by President Donald Trump and other Republican lawmakers for allegedly being politically biased against Trump in its investigations.

Wray reportedly suggested that McCabe move to a different job within the department, a move that would have been interpreted as a demotion, according to a former law enforcement official. But instead of taking the offer, McCabe, who was eligible to retire in a few weeks, stepped down.

McCabe's decision comes amid a flurry of reports on the Trump administration's displeasure with the FBI and the US Justice Department amid the ongoing Trump-Russia investigation. Wray reportedly threatened to resign after being pressured by Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fire McCabe.

On Monday, it was also reported that Trump vented to McCabe and mocked his wife, a failed Democratic Senate candidate in Virginia, during a phone call immediately after the president fired Comey.

SEE ALSO: Trump reportedly turned on his acting FBI director and mocked his wife in a phone call right after he fired James Comey

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how the map of the United States has changed in 200 years



source http://www.businessinsider.com/james-comey-tweet-andrew-mccabe-fbi-2018-1

'SNL' addressed the controversy surrounding the Aziz Ansari sexual misconduct allegation in a darkly funny skit

SNL Aziz Ansari

  • "SNL" addressed the Aziz Ansari sexual misconduct allegation and the surrounding controversy in the form of an uncomfortable dinner party conversation. 
  • A woman accused Ansari of sexual misconduct in a story with Babe.net earlier this month, but many criticized aspects of the story's reporting, including a New York Times op-ed that defended Ansari. 
  • The darkly funny sketch satirizes the difficulty of discussing the subject.

 

"Saturday Night Live" tackled the tricky conversation surrounding the recent Aziz Ansari sexual misconduct allegation in a darkly funny sketch of a dinner party conversation.

In the sketch, when cast member Heidi Gardner asks the table if anyone has read a New York Times op-ed about Ansari, it elicits a series of uncomfortable responses that satirize the difficulty of discussing the topic. 

Earlier this month, an anonymous woman accused Ansari of sexual misconduct in a story with Babe.net. The woman, a 23-year-old photographer, told Babe that after an encounter with Ansari she "felt violated," and described it as "sexual assault." Ansari said in a statement that from his point of view all indications were that the encounter was "completely consensual."

Many criticized aspects of the reporting of the story, including a New York Times op-ed that defended Ansari explicitly, and the piece sparked the first substantive and mainstream public debate of the topic since the #MeToo movement gained prominence.

In the sketch, the restaurant darkens and ominous horror music plays as the topic of Ansari comes up. Then the cast members proceed to make hesitant remarks on the subject, before another interrupts to keep them from going too far. 

"While I applaud the movement …" Kenan Thompson begins to discuss the #MeToo movement, to which Gardner quickly warns him, "Watch it." 

Watch the sketch below:

SEE ALSO: A woman's account of feeling sexually 'violated' by comedian Aziz Ansari has sparked the first big debate around the #MeToo movement

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An exercise scientist reveals exactly how long you need to work out to get in great shape



source http://www.businessinsider.com/snl-addressed-aziz-ansari-sexual-misconduct-allegation-darkly-funny-skit-2018-1

Friday, January 26, 2018

Mexico's tourism minister wants to reduce violence in tourist hotspots by legalizing marijuana

A participant prepares a marijuana joint during the Global Marijuana March 2017, in support of the legalization of marijuana in Mexico City, Mexico May 6, 2017. REUTERS/Henry Romero

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Marijuana should be legalized in two of Mexico's main tourist hot spots, Cancun and Los Cabos, in order to reduce criminal violence, Mexico's minister for tourism said on Thursday.

Minister Enrique de la Madrid said Mexico could follow the example of the United States and legalize marijuana in areas with support, urging Quintana Roo, where Cancun lies, and Baja California Sur, the home of Los Cabos, to move ahead with it.

"It's absurd that we're not taking this step as a country," de la Madrid told reporters at a conference in Mexico City.

"Even if there's work to do on the whole of the country, I'd like to see that it might be done in Baja California and Quintana Roo," he added, describing the states as victims of a poor drug law.

Baja California and Quintana Roo have been two of the states hardest hit by a jump in gang violence in the country over the past year, helping to prompt verbal swipes from US President Donald Trump about how dangerous it is in Mexico.

Mexico Playa del Carmen nightclub shooting police

Baja California Sur saw its total number of homicide victims increase from 225 in 2016 to 738 last year. The state's homicide rate rose from 24.4 homicides per 100,000 in 2016 to 69.15 in 2017. In Quintana Roo, the number of homicide victims rose from 165 in 2016 to 359 in 2017. The state's homicide rate rose 5.85 homicides per 100,000 people in 2016 to 8.53 last year.

Asked whether such a move would create marijuana tourism, de la Madrid said tourists "already bring it or buy it, so they don't come for that. What can't be justified is that a user goes to jail because he consumes marijuana. What is not justified is that he is a victim of extortion because he consumers marijuana. It is absurd." 

De la Madrid later said in a Twitter post that his comments reflected his personal views, "based on the analysis and study of the subject for many years."

mexico drugs weed

There are no state-level drug prohibitions in Mexico, and legalizing at the state level would require changing the general health law, which is national in scope, according to security analyst Alejandro Hope.

Hope also said it was unlikely that the illicit market for marijuana was a main driver of violence, contrasting it with that for cocaine or heroin. 

President Enrique Pena Nieto has said the United States and Mexico should not pursue diverging policies on marijuana. In 2016, he proposed a bill to allow Mexicans to carry up to an ounce of marijuana, but the measure stalled in Congress.

Carlos Mendoza, governor of Baja California Sur, told local media that if the idea were adopted, it should be implemented in various areas popular with tourists.

"It seems foolish and illogical that we're here fighting with a strategy that costs lives in Mexico and magically, crossing the border, marijuana becomes legal," he said. California this month became the sixth US state to legalize the drug despite a federal ban.

Despite the trend toward legalization north of the border, cartels still make millions of dollars from smuggling marijuana into the United States. Mexico legalized marijuana use for medical and scientific needs in June.

(Reporting for Reuters by Daina Beth Solomon; additional reporting by Lizbeth Diaz; editing by Dave Graham and Cynthia Osterman)

SEE ALSO: Mexico had its most homicides in decades in 2017 — and 2018 is off to a gruesome start

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how Attorney General Sessions could shut down the legal marijuana industry overnight



source http://www.businessinsider.com/r-mexico-minister-backs-marijuana-legalization-in-major-beach-resorts-2018-1

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Trump reportedly ordered Robert Mueller fired the month after he was appointed special counsel over the Russia investigation

Don McGahn

  • President Donald Trump reportedly ordered special counsel Robert Mueller to be fired, one month after dismissing FBI director James Comey.
  • White House counsel Don McGahn refused to direct the Justice Department to fire Mueller, and instead, threatened to resign.
  • Mueller is reportedly aware of the incident.


President Donald Trump reportedly ordered special counsel Robert Mueller to be fired, one month after he was appointed, following FBI director James Comey's dismissal, according to four sources who were briefed on the incident, The New York Times reported Thursday.

The White House counsel reportedly balked at the notion and refused to direct the Justice Department to fire Mueller, and Trump was said to have eventually backed down from the decision, according to The Times.

White House counsel Don McGahn also reportedly threatened to resign after the request, arguing that Mueller's firing would bring about consequences for the Trump administration.

Mueller is reportedly aware of the incident after interviewing current and former senior White House officials, The Times continued. 

Trump reportedly floated potential conflicts of interests behind his decision to fire Mueller, according to The Times, including a dispute over membership fees that led Mueller to cancel his membership at the Trump National Golf Course in 2011. Mueller's spokesman previously challenged that account, saying there was no dispute between the golf course and Mueller, according to The Washington Post.

Mueller is deep into an investigation of possible collusion between Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and Russia, and whether Trump obstructed justice as the investigation picked up steam in 2017. Mueller's team has interviewed several key members of Trump's administration, including Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former chief of staff Reince Priebus, and has also charged Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and his business partner and deputy campaign manager, Richard Gates.

On Wednesday, Trump appeared to be open to the possibility of testifying under oath to Mueller: "I am looking forward to it, actually," Trump said.

SEE ALSO: Trump reportedly used similar tactics to get inside the head of another FBI official after he fired James Comey

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This congressman wants to target the USPS to help stop the opioid crisis



source http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ordered-mueller-fired-last-year-2018-1

The war to confirm Trump's judicial nominees is heating up again

Dianne Feinstein

  • The brewing war over President Donald Trump's judicial nominees turned hot again.
  • This time, it involves the "blue slip" process and a Wisconsin judicial nominee.


The Senate battle over the confirmation of President Donald Trump's judicial nominees turned hot again this week as Democrats went after Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, accusing him of going back on his word for how he would handle the "blue slip" process.

It was the latest dust-up in what's been a lengthy — and mostly under-the-radar — fight to get Trump's judges on the federal bench.

On Wednesday, Grassley held a hearing for Michael Brennan, a Wisconsin lawyer nominated to a vacancy on the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. Brennan received a "blue slip" from Republican Sen. Ron Johnson but not from Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin.

The blue slip is a century-old Senate tradition that allows senators to give or withhold their blessing for a judicial nominee from their state. The process provides the party that does not control the White House with leverage over a good number of the president's nominations.

The process is intended to provide a more bipartisan consensus on judges who will serve in or represent a senator's home state when the president is of the opposition party, encouraging communication between the White House and home-state senators before a nomination. But the opposition party has sometimes used the blue-slip process to stonewall nominations and prevent the president from naming judges in their states.

Late last year, Grassley said he would no longer require both home-state senator blue slips to be returned for circuit court nominees in order for the nominee to receive a hearing before the committee, which had been the precedent. However, Democrats pointed to Grassley saying he would still honor the old system if a home-state senator was not properly consulted by the White House ahead of a nomination.

"Senator Joe Biden, when he was Judiciary Committee chairman, articulated a sensible policy with respect to the blue slip," Grassley said in his November 2017 speech outlining the new blue-slip policy. "He said that a negative blue slip will be 'a significant factor' for the Committee to weigh but that 'it will not preclude consideration of a nominee' unless the administration failed to consult with the senator. I intend to follow this practice for negative and unreturned blue slips. This practice is consistent with the vast majority of the blue slip's history."

In this instance, Baldwin insists she was not properly consulted, but Grassley advanced the nomination anyway.

A Judiciary Committee spokesman said Grassley met with Baldwin last week to discuss her concerns, adding that Baldwin "was adequately consulted before" Brennan's nomination.

"So there is no reason to further delay committee consideration,” spokesman Taylor Foy said in statement to Roll Call.

Baldwin denied any "meaningful consultation" took place.

'I find it really very hard, and particularly for a woman senator who has tried so hard ... for her view to be rebuffed in this manner'

In Wisconsin, Johnson and Baldwin established in 2013 a bipartisan judicial nomination commission by which possible nominees are considered. Brennan did go through the commission, but Baldwin said it did not support his nomination, which the White House made in August. Additionally, the White House interviewed Brennan in March, before the commission began reviewing him.

"The president showed a complete disregard for a process that has served our state well for decades," Baldwin said in a Monday statement. "I am extremely troubled that the president took this partisan approach that disrespects our Wisconsin process."

Baldwin added that Grassley "should not show the same disrespect by breaking with 30 years of precedent and eliminating the blue slip process for this nomination."

Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the ranking member on the Judiciary Committee, criticized Grassley as well.

"Mr. Chairman, I find it really very hard, and particularly for a woman senator who has tried so hard, who has worked with her state commission, for her view to be rebuffed in this manner," she said in remarks ahead of the hearing.

Feinstein added that Baldwin "appears grievously injured by this."

"She has worked with, what I understand, is a very fine screening commission with Sen. Johnson in the state, and is deeply concerned that this action has been taken," she said. "I recognize the majority party has a great deal of power. Their voice is dispositive. But the Senate, unlike the House, has preserved strong rights for those in the minority, and the blue slip has been one of these traditions. It appears this is no longer the case."

Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond professor and expert on judicial nominations, told Business Insider in an email that this "situation is very different" from Grassley having considered past nominees who lacked at least one blue slip because of how Baldwin was not properly consulted.

"The nominee did not secure the requisite votes to be recommended to the White House" by the Wisconsin commission, "but the White House nominated him anyway."

"Grassley said that he was making an exception for circuit nominees, but that lacks persuasiveness as a matter of historical practice and slips can be even more important for circuits as all senators treat these vacancies as more important than district ones," he continued. "[Democratic] senators like Feinstein, [Chris] Coons and [Sheldon] Whitehouse strongly argued that Grassley's move was unfair to Baldwin and to the process in the future because it will be difficult to restore the tradition once it is eroded."

SEE ALSO: The first shots were just fired in the Senate's brewing judiciary war

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A Georgetown professor explains how Martin Luther King Jr. 'has been severely whitewashed'



source http://www.businessinsider.com/war-trump-judicial-nominees-heating-up-2018-1

Rap mogul Russel Simmons accused of rape in a $5 million lawsuit

russell simmons

  • Rap mogul Russell Simmons is facing a civil lawsuit for allegedly raping filmmaker Jennifer Jarosik in August 2016.
  • Jarosik, who is seeking $5 million in damages, is the sixth woman to accuse Simmons of sexual assault or misconduct.
  • Simmons has denied all allegations. 

 

A woman accused rap mogul Russell Simmons of rape in a civil lawsuit filed Wednesday, according to NBC News.

In the suit filed in a U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, documentary filmmaker Jennifer Jarosik alleges that Simmons sexually assaulted her in August 2016 when she met Simmons at his home to discuss a film he had agreed to finance.

Jarosik, who is seeking $5 million in damages, said in the suit that Simmons allegedly got aggressive after she refused to have sex with him. She said he pushed her onto his bed, causing her to hit her head. She claims Simmons then "pounced on her while she was still in shock and fear, and proceeded to rape her."

Jarosik is now the sixth woman to accuse Simmons, the cofounder of Def Jam Recordings, of sexual assault or misconduct.

Simmons stepped down from his companies in November after allegations of sexual assault from the screenwriter Jenny Lumet and model Keri Claussen Khalighi. In December, three other women accused Simmons of rape in a New York Times story.

Simmons has denied all allegations and told NBC in a statement on Wednesday that he looks forward to the court case "to make use of fair processes that ensure that justice will be done and that the full truth will be known."

Jarosik's attorney, Perry C. Wander, said in a statement to Billboard that the case against Simmons is emblematic of a systemic problem in the music industry:

"It's time that the hip hop industry face the music and recognize that the deep rooted history of misogyny and discrimination against women in the music industry has to come to an end. #TimesUp. It's not enough to apologize and step away from your business, convert a yoga studio to a nonprofit and still draw a salary and be worth $500 million and do nothing but apologize. As James Franco said, 'if I need to make restitution I’ll do that. Mr. Simmons practices meditation, yoga and is a long time vegan practicing non violence against animals. So basically he treats animals better than women. The hypocrisy has to stop now."

SEE ALSO: Russell Simmons has stepped down from his companies and been dropped by HBO after a new sexual assault allegation

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how LeBron James stays in incredible shape



source http://www.businessinsider.com/russel-simmons-accused-rape-5-million-lawsuit-2018-1

The organization involved in the Paradise Papers leak allegedly represented a bank accused of funding terrorism, report says

appleby paradise papers

  • Appleby, the firm at the center of last year's massive Paradise Papers leak, allegedly provided services to a bank accused of facilitating global terror and crime, according to a Guardian report.
  • Appleby had represented the Federal Bank of the Middle East (FBME) since 2004, the report said.
  • FBME was described as “a financial institution of primary money laundering concern" according to US federal court documents filed in October 2017.
  • The bank denies the allegations.


Appleby, the firm at the center of last year's massive Paradise Papers leak allegedly provided services to a bank accused of facilitating global terror and crime, the Guardian reported on Tuesday.

Appleby had allegedly represented the international Federal Bank of the Middle East (FBME) since 2004, according to the report.

The US Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) leveled several major allegations against FBME, calling it a "primary money laundering concern," according to US federal court documents filed in October 2017.

A 2014 note published by FinCEN in the US Federal Register went further in its description of FBME's alleged activities:

“FBME is used by its customers to facilitate money laundering, terrorist financing, transnational organised crime, fraud, sanctions evasion and other illicit activity internationally and through the US financial system,” the note said.

Additionally, the 2014 note alleged that at least one of FBME's customers was a front-company for the group, Scientific Studies and Research Center, an entity that was sanctioned by the US and was determined to be a "proliferator of weapons of mass destruction," according to the note.

FBME has vehemently denied the allegations. A spokesperson for the institution said: "The outrageous claims that FBME acted for terrorists, or knowingly acted for any sanctioned individuals, are false and deliberately damaging."

"Any client that was sanctioned had their accounts frozen immediately and were reported to the regulator," the bank said.

Appleby ended its relationship with FBME in 2015, according to federal court documents.

SEE ALSO: The massive 'Paradise Papers' leak reveals how the world's wealthiest individuals and companies move their money

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An exercise scientist reveals the exercise regime that will burn the most fat



source http://www.businessinsider.com/appleby-firm-paradise-papers-allegedly-linked-to-bank-with-terror-ties-2018-1

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Trump says he doesn't remember asking an FBI official who he voted for

trump

  • President Donald Trump said he does not remember asking deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe last year who he voted for in the 2016 US presidential election.
  • Trump said he didn't know why the question would have been a "big deal" and that he believed it was "a very unimportant question."


President Donald Trump said that he did not remember asking deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe last year who he voted for in the 2016 US presidential election, according to a New York Times report published Wednesday.

"I don't think so; no, I don't think I did," Trump said in an impromptu meeting with reporters, according to The Times. "I don't know what's the big deal with that."

"I don't remember asking him the question," Trump continued. "I think it's also a very unimportant question."

Trump reportedly posed the question to McCabe, who at the time was named the acting FBI director after Trump fired James Comey in May, current and former officials said in a Washington Post report published on Tuesday.

McCabe, who reportedly told Trump he did not vote in the 2016 election, said that he found Trump's question "disturbing," one former official told The Post.

The question raised eyebrows nonetheless, in light of Trump's alleged attempts to gain a promise of loyalty from Comey during a private White House meeting between the two men after Trump was inaugurated.

SEE ALSO: Trump reportedly asked deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe who he voted for in the 2016 election

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how the map of the United States has changed in 200 years



source http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-doesnt-remember-asking-mccabe-who-he-voted-for-2018-1

The Kentucky school shooting is the third just this week — and the 11th in the US so far this year

School shooting

  • There have been 11 school shootings in the US already in 2018.
  • Most of the incidents were suicides and resulted in no injuries, but they highlight increasing concerns communities have about guns and school safety.
  • By this point last year, there were five school shootings nationwide.


A 15-year-old boy walked into a Kentucky high school Tuesday with a handgun and opened fire, killing two students and injuring 17 others.

Police responded quickly, apprehended the shooter, and secured the scene. The injured students were transported to hospitals for treatment as the shaken, rural community of Benton tried to make sense of the tragedy that had just unfolded.

Just over three weeks into the new year, there have already been 11 school shootings in the US, including suicides and incidents that left no one injured, The New York Times reported Wednesday. The shooting in Kentucky is the third at a school this week alone.

On Monday, a 16-year-old shot and injured a female student several times at Italy High School in Texas. That same day, someone in a pickup truck fired at a group of students gathered in front of Net Charter School in New Orleans. A 14-year-old boy was injured.

School shootings have become all too familiar, even in the wake of massacres at Virginia Tech in 2007 and Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, which sparked outrage, but little policy change.

"The news cycles are so short right now in America, and there’s a lot going on," Shannon Wattz, a gun control advocate, told The Times. "But you would think that shootings in American schools would be able to clear away some of that clutter."

By this time last year, there were five reported school shootings, according to a running tally compiled by Everytown for Gun Safety, a gun control advocacy group.

Since 2013, there have been 281 school shootings nationwide, an average of about one shooting per week.

Here's a list of all the school shootings already in 2018:

  • January 3: A 31-year-old man shot and killed himself in the parking lot of his former elementary school in Michigan.
  • January 4: Shots were fired at New Start High School outside Seattle. No one was hit or hurt.
  • January 5: A bullet from a pellet gun shattered the window of a Forest City school bus full of students while in transit. No one was injured.
  • January 9: A 14-year-old male student committed suicide in the bathroom of an elementary school in Arizona.
  • January 10: A bullet fired from off-campus hit a building at California State University, San Bernardino. No one was injured.
  • January 10: A student at Grayson College in Texas accidentally fired a bullet during a gun training session with an instructor, but no one was hurt.
  • January 15: Police in Marhsall, Texas, responded to reports of gunfire just after midnight on the Wiley College campus. A stray bullet entered one of the dormitories, but no one was hit.
  • January 20: A Winston-Salem State University football player was shot and killed during an on-campus event.
  • January 22: A 16-year-old shot and injured a female student several times at Italy High School in Texas.
  • January 22: Someone in a pickup truck fired at a group of students gathered in front of Net Charter School in New Orleans. One boy was injured.
  • January 23: A 15-year-old student at a high school in Kentucky shot and killed two students and injured 17 others.

SEE ALSO: At least 2 students dead, 17 injured in shooting at Kentucky high school

SEE ALSO: 'Newtown will never be the same': Reflections on Sandy Hook, 5 years later from Sen. Chris Murphy

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A reporter who met with the former spy behind the Trump-Russia dossier explains why it’s not 'fake news'



source http://www.businessinsider.com/school-shootings-2018-1

The director of 'Hoop Dreams' finally has his first best documentary Oscar nomination thanks to a movie about the only bank charged after the 2008 mortgage crisis

Abacus Sean Lyness final

  • Steve James' latest documentary looks at the only bank to be indicted in connection to the 2008 mortgage crisis.
  • The movie has received an Oscar nomination in the best documentary category, the first ever nomination for James, whose landmark doc "Hoop Dreams" was famously snubbed.


On Tuesday, Steve James got the call that he gave up on years ago: one of his documentaries is finally Oscar nominated.

Over a career that has spanned three-plus decades, James has made memorable documentaries like "Stevie," "The Interrupters," and "Life Itself," but he will always be most famous for making 1994's "Hoop Dreams." His debut feature looks at the lives of two inner-city Chicago boys as they aspire to play in the NBA one day. The movie has gone one to be regarded as one of the best non-fiction works ever made. Legendary film critic Roger Ebert once called the movie "the great American documentary." 

But in one of the most famous snubs in Oscar history, "Hoop Dreams" did not get nominated for a best documentary (though it did get nominated for best editing). 

Now James finally has his nomination thanks to "Abacus: Small Enough to Jail." 

In 2012, Abacus Federal Savings Bank was indicted on charges of fraud in relation to hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of mortgages that had been sold to Fannie Mae from 2005 to 2010. It's the only bank to be indicted in connection to the 2008 mortgage crisis, which led to a $700 billion government bailout.

The case of Abacus, a reliable institution for thousands of Chinese immigrants that is run by Thomas Sung, who's considered the George Bailey of Chinatown, was a shock for many in the community, while for the rest of the country the news seemed to tell a story of a dishonest bank that was finally getting its comeuppance.

James follows the bank's surprising decision to fight the charges from the New York County District Attorney's Office, which led to a David-versus-Goliath court battle that revealed how thin the case against Abacus really was. James spent the length of the three-month trial following the Sung family as they tried to clear their name (the charges were dismissed in 2015).

"The point of view of this film is clear from the start — it's kind of clear from the title," James told Business Insider. "We think this was a miscarriage of justice."

ABACUS PBSJames learned of the case through his producer Mark Mitten, who knew the Sungs. The filmmaker had an initial meeting with Sung and his daughters, Jill and Vera — who are executives at the bank — and Heather, who actually worked at the New York DA's office when the bank was charged (she left shortly after). Then James knew he wanted to tell their story. But he didn't want it to be one-sided, which started the long road to get people from the DA's office to talk on camera.

"We didn't get them to talk for the film until after the trial, though we tried throughout," said James, who felt it was crucial to have the other perspective in the movie, even if he didn't agree with it. "There are not two equal sides of the story, but that aside, it doesn't relieve us of the responsibility to really articulate the case against the Sungs, because my feeling is by really laying out the case against them you also not just hear the case — you see how weak the case against them was."

Because James wasn't allowed to film in the courtroom during the trial, he had to come up with another way not just to show what happened inside but also to make it compelling.

"We actually hired a courtroom artist to go in several days and make some baseline illustrations," James said. "Then we embellished them. There's angles in those sequences that no courtroom artist could ever get."

Showing over-the-shoulder sketches and detailed reactions of the Sungs matched the compelling testimony. Especially the DA's star witness, former Abacus loan manager Ken Yu (who was fired after bank executives learned he was committing fraud), practically admitting how he pulled off his illegal acts behind the backs of everyone at Abacus while on the stand. Yu became the figure who ultimately unraveled the prosecutors' case.

Another hurdle was simply telling a story set in the financial world that would keep audiences interested — always a challenge. James recalls a day when he and the crew were shooting in an empty courtroom and an officer with them asked which case they were doing the movie on.

"I told him Abacus, and after I explained he said, 'Oh, that's a paper trial,'" James recalled. "That was translation for a boring trial. It's not sexy. And that was the challenge. This wasn't one of the big banks being put on trial, but we felt a duty to tell the story and the ridiculousness of the DA's case."

James was attending the Sundance Film Festival when he got word that "Abacus" was an Oscar nominee. The festival is showing his latest work, "America to Me," a 10-part docuseries looking at race relations at a Chicago high school.

Here's how James reacted when he was introduced at a screening following the Oscar nominations:

"Abacus: Small Enough to Jail" is currently available on streaming services.

SEE ALSO: Robert De Niro talks about how he got inside the head of Bernie Madoff for his new movie

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An exercise scientist reveals exactly how long you need to work out to get in great shape



source http://www.businessinsider.com/oscars-2018-abacus-documentary-nomination-steve-james-hoop-dreams-2018-1

James Franco accuser calls actor 'exploitative' but 'not a Harvey Weinstein' in first TV interview

james franco

  • Two women who accused actor James Franco of sexually "exploitative" behavior made their first televised interview with "Good Morning America" on Tuesday.
  • Sarah Tither-Kaplan said in the interview that Franco "created exploitative environments" in his classes at a film school she attended, but is "absolutely not a Harvey Weinstein."
  • Violet Paley, who had been in a consensual relationship with Franco, said she was "regretful" of continuing her relationship with the actor after an alleged instance of sexual misconduct.
  • Franco has said the allegations are "not accurate."

 

Two of the women who accused James Franco of sexually "exploitative" behavior in a Los Angeles Times story earlier this month made their first televised appearance on Tuesday on "Good Morning America."

Sarah Tither-Kaplan, who has accused Franco of engaging in inappropriate behavior while teaching acting classes at the film school he founded, told ABC's Amy Robach that Franco "created exploitative environments" but is "absolutely not a Harvey Weinstein."

sarah tither-kaplan franco"He is not an unfeeling monster who has no sense of reality," Tither-Kaplan said when asked where Franco falls on the spectrum of behavior in Hollywood. "He created exploitative environments for non-celebrity women on his sets, [but] I also think James is a talented and valuable person."

"It's a pyramid, and at the top is rape and sexual violence, and at the bottom are the other abuses of power that, when they continue to happen over and over, build and build and build and create a culture that allows the most heinous examples of sexual violence and misogyny and discrimination to happen," Tither-Kaplan continued. "And so if we allow any of them, we're allowing all of them."

Violet Paley, who said she had been in a consensual relationship with Franco, also alleged that the actor pressured her into a sexual act she was unwilling to engage in.

Paley told Robach she was "regretful" of continuing a consensual relationship with Franco after the alleged incident. 

Franco said the allegations were "not accurate" in an interview with Stephen Colbert earlier this month. 

Watch the "GMA" interview below:

SEE ALSO: James Franco tells Colbert that the sexual misconduct allegations against him are 'not accurate,' as criticism lights up Twitter

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what losing weight does to your body and brain



source http://www.businessinsider.com/james-franco-accuser-actor-exploitative-not-harvey-weinstein-gma-2018-1

In a settlement with couriers, Postmates will pay some drivers differently depending on what state they're in

postmates courier delivery 9915

  • Postmates reached a settlement with thousands of current and former drivers after it classified them as independent contractors rather than employees. 
  • Postmates will pay drivers differently in the settlement, depending on which state they're in, due to the nuances of each jurisdiction's labor laws.

 

Postmates and its couriers reached a settlement last year over an allegation that the food-delivery service incorrectly classified drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. But a letter to the couriers shows that each of their pieces of the pie depend largely on the location of their deliveries.

Postmates agreed to the $8.75 million settlement against thousands of current and former drivers across the U.S after denying the allegation that the classification of its drivers broke laws or regulations. About $2.8 million of the total fund will account for fees, and the rest will be allocated to those who submit claims in response to the letter. 

In the terms of the settlement, a breakdown of the compensation shows that four states in particular would make the most per mile, with Massachusetts leading the pack, due to the nuances of each jurisdiction's labor laws:

The Settlement Fund will be allocated to Class Members proportionally to their delivery miles while on delivery on the Postmates mobile application, with multipliers for miles driven in the following states, which are calibrated to account for the applicable laws and legal standards for similar claims in those states: California (2.0); Massachusetts (3.0); New York (1.5); D.C. (1.5).

The settlement is pending court approval, and the final dollar amount paid to each courier will depend on the number of claims submitted. Still, the letter estimates that drivers in California would receive approximately $0.14 per mile, those in Massachusetts would receive approximately $0.20 per mile, New York and D.C. drivers would get about $0.10, while everyone else would receive about $0.07 per mile.

Some have already taken to Twitter to express excitement for reaping the benefits:


That said, couriers outside of those four states are getting a little less on the mile:

In a statement from the company, a representative provided an explanation for the settlement decision (emphasis ours):

"Postmates is committed to providing those who perform deliveries on the platform with flexible terms of service and an opportunity for fair and reasonable dispute resolution. We believe this proposed class action settlement does both. We also believe that by preserving the autonomy of our fleet -- to control when, where, and how they access the Postmates platform -- we enable efficient on-demand deliveries that boost local merchant sales and powers commerce across the country. Our platform has enabled members of our fleet to supplement their incomes by more than $400M to date. Moreover, Postmates stimulates growth for local economies by linking our network of customers and couriers to the brick and mortar merchants in their own communities."

The final settlement approval hearing will be on April 20, 2018.

SEE ALSO: What it's like to be a Postmates delivery guy

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The coolest gadgets we saw at CES 2018



source http://www.businessinsider.com/postmates-class-action-lawsuit-couriers-2018-1

The filmmakers behind Netflix’s Gloria Allred documentary explain how the #MeToo movement changed their movie: 'We thought the film was done'

seeing allred sundance institute

  • The Netflix documentary "Seeing Allred" gives viewers a look inside the life and career of attorney Gloria Allred.
  • Filmmakers Roberta Grossman, Sophie Sartain, and executive producer Marta Kauffman told Business Insider how they worked in the #MeToo movement just before they had to hand the movie in.


Women’s rights attorney Gloria Allred has spent a good chunk of her four-decade career getting in front of the camera. Her fight for women’s equality has often seen her in the spotlight, holding press conferences with her female clients who, over the years, have alleged sexual assault by some of the biggest names in entertainment, politics, sports, and business.

But when filmmakers Roberta Grossman and Sophie Sartain approached Allred about making a documentary about her life and career, the media-savvy attorney wasn’t very interested.

“We were persistent,” Sartain told Business Insider at the Sundance Film Festival, where the movie is having its world premiere, on how they pulled it off. “After about three years she agreed.”

During that time, Grossman and Sartain began to build a friendship with Allred’s law partners, who relayed to her that the filmmakers were sincere about doing a legacy piece on her. Grossman and Sartain had also brought on veteran TV producer Marta Kauffman (co-creator of “Friends”) to executive produce.

Kauffman’s involvement helped land Netflix (the streaming service will release the movie on February 9). The streaming giant agreed to take on the movie after seeing some of the footage the filmmakers had shot in 2014, the most striking of which shows Allred holding press conferences with women alleging Bill Cosby sexually assaulted them after spiking their drinks. This news would become a huge media story around the world.

Seeing Allred Roberta Grossman Sophie Sartain Gloria Allred Marta Kaufman Michael Loccisano GettyAlong with looking at Allred’s life, “Seeing Allred” also highlights the landmark moments leading up to the current #MeToo and Time’s Up movements. Before the bombshell stories emerged about Harvey Weinstein, Allred was representing women willing to go on the record and allege they had been sexually abused by Cosby — and soon after, then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.

The movie also looks back on Allred's history as a dogged advocate. In the 1970s, Allred, who had begun practicing law, was suddenly on talk shows and rallies being a vocal leader on women's issues like sexual harassment in the workplace and the wage gap. Women had someone they could turn to at a time when few lawyers would take on these issues.

The emergence of #MeToo

The challenge for the filmmakers came when the Weinstein allegations surfaced and the #MeToo movement went viral. Or when, as Kauffman put it, “The world changed.”

“We thought the film was done,” Grossman said.

“I had a day of panic,” Sartain said, in response to a question of how the filmmakers approached the idea of including the #MeToo movement in the movie.

“We knew we had to get this moment in as we felt [Allred] in part is responsible for it,” Grossman said. “It just reframed everything.”

But with a deadline looming and knowing that Allred's constant work meant the film would have to end while she was still in the middle of cases — Allred represents numerous women who have come forward saying Weinstein assaulted them — they couldn’t delve too heavily into #MeToo.

Then there’s the fact that Allred’s daughter, attorney Lisa Bloom, was an advisor to Weinstein when the story in The New York Times came out (Bloom resigned soon after the story ran), something that is touched on very briefly in the movie.

“That was all happening right as we were finishing, we didn’t want it to hijack the film,” Grossman said of Bloom's involvement with Weinstein.

The filmmakers ended up using the post-Weinstein allegations as a way to close out the movie, with Allred simply saying in a voiceover, "The fight has just begun."

What the movie does drive home is the shift in how Allred is portrayed now in the media. The lawyer, once the butt of jokes by late-night hosts and even portrayed on an episode of “South Park,” is now being championed for her work.

“Gloria Allred is a metaphor for the entire movement,” Kauffman said of #MeToo and Time’s Up. “People look at her as strident, a loud mouth, you can list the adjectives, but people said the same thing about feminists. I think in the film, by deepening her it deepens the movement, and it lets you see beyond what most people think is a brashness. Also, if she was a man fighting for something she'd be portrayed as an incredible leader.”

SEE ALSO: "The Tale" is an explosive look at its director's experience with sexual abuse that has Sundance audiences buzzing

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A sleep expert explains what happens to your body and brain if you don't get sleep



source http://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-gloria-allred-documentary-filmmakers-on-metoo-movement-2018-1

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Trump reportedly used similar tactics to get inside the head of another FBI official after he fired James Comey

Andrew McCabe

  • President Donald Trump reportedly asked the deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe who he voted for during an Oval Office meeting last year.
  • McCabe took over the FBI after Trump fired Comey in May. He told Trump he did not vote in the 2016 election.
  • The meeting between Trump and McCabe resembled the one-on-one time that the president had with Comey after his inauguration. During the meeting, Comey said that Trump asked him for his loyalty and requested that the FBI back off of his then-national security adviser Michael Flynn, who the FBI was investigating.
  • Comey later said he rebuffed Trump's request, which he confirmed during congressional testimony he gave last June.
  • The revelation potentially adds another wrinkle to the federal investigation of ties between Trump associates and Russian influence in the 2016 election.



Following former FBI director James Comey's ouster in May, President Donald Trump reportedly met with then-acting director Andrew McCabe and asked him who he voted for during the 2016 US presidential election, current and former officials cited by the Washington Post said in a report published on Tuesday.

McCabe, who reportedly said he did not vote in the election that year, found the question to be "disturbing," according to one for official.

Trump and McCabe later met again in the Oval Office, where the president interviewed McCabe for the role of FBI director, though The Washington Post notes that Trump had no intention of hiring McCabe for the job, due in part to his anger over McCabe's wife's failed run for Senate in Virginia.

Trump has accused the campaign of McCabe's wife, Jill, of taking donations from Hillary Clinton. The donations is question actually came from the Virginia Democratic Party and a super PAC aligned with Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, who is a Clinton supporter. She received no donations from Clinton herself.

Hallmarks of the Trump-Comey meeting

The conversation between Trump and McCabe loosely resembled the one-on-one time the president spent with James Comey shortly after taking office. He summoned Comey to the White House for a private dinner, during which he asked Comey for his loyalty.

Comey, who at the time was leading the Russia investigation, later said he was baffled by the request, but said he did not oblige. He said Trump also asked him to drop the bureau's investigation of his then-national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Comey said during congressional testimony last year that he recorded memos of the early private meetings with Trump out of concern for the nature of the encounters.

Railing against law and order

Though Trump ran his 2016 presidential campaign on a "law and order" platform, he has railed against top law-enforcement officials during his entire first year in office.

The interactions between McCabe and Trump, just like those previous encounters with Comey, are also part of a broader effort in which Trump has apparently sought to wrangle top law-enforcement officials who have proximity to the Russia investigation.

During his first year in office, Trump has publicly rankled Attorney General Jeff Sessions for recusing himself from the Russia probe. He taunted McCabe on social media, scolded White House general counsel Don McGahn for not intervening in the investigation.

More recently, Sessions has pressured the Trump-appointed FBI director Christopher Wray to remove McCabe. Political observers have speculated that Sessions was acting on Trump's wishes to shake up the FBI. Wray reportedly threatened to resign over the White House's alleged meddling.

SEE ALSO: FBI director reportedly threatened to resign after being pressured to fire his deputy

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A reporter who met with the former spy behind the Trump-Russia dossier explains why it’s not 'fake news'



source http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-asked-andrew-mccabe-who-he-voted-for-after-comey-firing-2018-1

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff: Facebook should be regulated like the cigarette industry (CRM)

CNBC Davos

  • Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff says some technology has addictive qualities and should be regulated.
  • Benioff is the latest high profile tech executive to raise questions about the way some tech products have become intertwined in people's daily lives. 


Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff may have made his billions selling software, but that doesn't mean he's giving the tech industry a free pass. 

Speaking with CNBC correspondent Andrew Ross Sorkin from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday, Benioff said that it's about time for Washington to start regulating Silicon Valley.

With discussions about Russian interference in US elections and the addictiveness of consumer tech currently at the forefront of the national conversation, Benioff said, Facebook should be regulated "exactly the same way you regulated the cigarette industry," with the safety of consumers coming before the financial health of the companies.

It's a sharp criticism from within an industry that has historically evaded government regulation. But Benioff isn't the first CEO to suggest that all is not well in paradise.

Apple CEO Tim Cook spoke up last week to say that he didn't want his nephew to use social networking sites. Even Sean Parker, former president of Facebook, recently suggested that social networks are a net-negative, saying, "God only knows what it's doing to our children's brains."

Here's a transcript of the conversation:

Sorkin: How would you regulate a company like Facebook?

Benioff: You'd do it exactly the same way you regulated the cigarette industry. Here's a product, cigarettes. They're addictive. You know, they're not good for you. Maybe there is all kinds of different forces trying to get you to do certain things. There's a lot of parallels.

Sorkins: Is that how you feel about social media?

Benioff: For the most part, yeah.

Sorkin: Meaning, thinking about it as like a cigarette, in that kind of addictive way?

Benioff: I think that for sure technology has addictive qualities that we have to address and that product designers are working to make those products more addictive. We need to reign that back as much as possible.

SEE ALSO: We don't need tech to become less addictive — we just need it to be better

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how LeBron James stays in incredible shape



source http://www.businessinsider.com/salesforce-ceo-marc-benioff-said-at-davos-that-facebook-should-be-regulated-like-cigarettes-2018-1