Thursday, March 29, 2018

Roseanne Barr is under fire for appearing to promote a conspiracy theory about a Parkland student activist

Roseanne barr

  • Roseanne Barr is under fire for appearing to promote a far-right conspiracy theory about the Parkland school shooting activist David Hogg. 
  • In a since-deleted tweet, Barr wrote the words "NAZI SALUTE" in response to a conspiracy theorist's post that tagged Hogg.  
  • Barr's tweet seemed to reference a debunked conspiracy that Hogg raised a Nazi salute at a March for Our Lives rally on Saturday.

Roseanne Barr sparked controversy this week for appearing to promote a far-right conspiracy theory about the Parkland shooting student-activist David Hogg. 

On Tuesday evening, just before the revival of her ABC sitcom "Roseanne" premiered, Barr tweeted the words "NAZI SALUTE" in response to a Twitter user who tagged Hogg in a tweet. She later deleted her tweet.

Barr, a vocal Trump supporter with a history of promoting right-wing conspiracy theories, seemed to be referencing a far-right conspiracy theory that Hogg raised a Nazi salute at a March for Our Lives rally on Saturday.

As Mic noted, a number of Twitter users, including Chrissy Teigen, criticized Barr for the tweet, while some called out ABC for giving Barr a platform with her revived sitcom.

 

Barr has previously used her Twitter page to promote debunked far-right conspiracies including Pizzagate and the  conspiracy of a "cover-up" in the death of former Democratic National Convention staffer Seth Rich. 

ABC did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the matter.

SEE ALSO: Roseanne Barr has a history of supporting Trump — and promoting right-wing conspiracy theories

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why 555 is always used for phone numbers on TV and in movies



source http://www.businessinsider.com/roseanne-barr-under-fire-for-nazi-salute-tweet-conspiracy-theory-parkland-student-david-hogg-2018-3

The son of one of Mexico's most powerful kingpins describes growing up in the narco underworld — 'in a golden cage'

Serafin Zambada Ortiz and Ismael Zambada Imperial

  • One of Sinaloa capo Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada's sons was sentenced to prison time in the US this month.
  • At his trial, Serafin Zambada Ortiz detailed his experiences growing up alongside and within Mexico's narco culture.
  • Others in Sinaloa state and throughout Mexico live close to and are shaped by the country's drug-related violence.


Serafin Zambada Ortiz, the 27-year-old son of Sinaloa cartel chief Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, was sentenced to five and half years in a US prison on March 20.

In letters to the court, Serafin, a US citizen born in San Diego, outlined his upbringing among some of Mexico's most powerful drug traffickers, describing his proximity to the violence that surrounds narco life.

Serafin's mother, Leticia Ortize Hernandez, and his father knew each other from growing up outside of Culiacan, the capital of Mexico's Sinaloa state. They encountered each other again in 1988 in Mexicali, a city on the US border in Baja California state, and she fell in love with Zambada, who was 15 years older and already a rising figure in the drug trade.

After Serafin was born, Benjamin Arellano Felix and Amado Carrillo Fuentes, both kingpins, became his godfathers, according to The San Diego Union-Tribune. But war soon broke out between the Arellano Felix Organization and the Sinaloa cartel over control of Tijuana.

Serafin and his mother retreated to Culiacan, looking for safety, but the violence followed them.

Mexico Sinaloa marijuana drug trafficking Culiacan homicides crime scene

The day he turned 2 years old, a car bomb detonated outside his birthday party.

"From that day on, our lives were never the same," his mother said, according to court records seen by The Union-Tribune. "The same men that not long before stood up for our children in church and promised to raise them to be good Catholics were now trying to kill them."

When Serafin was 9, gunmen stormed a Mazatlan hotel room that he and his mother had recently left, killing his grandparents, uncle, and aunt. Sinaloa cartel rivals eventually killed his mother's family, and she soon started moving her children from home to home and keeping Serafin out of school. They were accompanied by armed guards sent by his father.

"From 1992 to the year 2000 the days were difficult and bloody and a stupid senseless war where many families were destroyed and with a lot of pain in their hearts," his mother said, according to The Union-Tribune.

Serafin, his mother, and his sister moved back and forth between Arizona and Sinaloa over the next few years. The war with the Arellano Felix Organization eased in the early 2000s, as the AFO lost ground. But a new conflict emerged in the late 2000s, when the Beltran Leyva Organization broke away and took up arms against its erstwhile Sinaloa allies.

Culiacan, Mexico

Serafin later attended the Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, where, out of the shadow of narco culture, classmates said he took to school and soccer. He took classes in agronomy, but his stint away from the drug trade soon ended.

"Unfortunately, I returned to Culiacán Sinaloa and I say unfortunately because in that city there is nothing more than the drug trade," Serafin told the judge in a letter.

In 2010, he married a girl from another family involved in trafficking, and they soon had two children. In November 2013, he was picked up on a warrant as he crossed the border into Nagoles, Arizona.

In September 2014, he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to import more than 100 kilograms of cocaine and more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana to the US and agreed to forfeit $250,000 in drug profits, which has already been turned over, according to The Union-Tribune.

Sinaloa cartel leaders El Chapo Guzman El Mayo Zambada

In letters to the court, Serafin expressed remorse.

"In this drug business one hurts a lot of people and I your honor regret having been the cause of causing so much damage to many people with the drug business," he wrote. "I have learned here in this place that drugs destroy many lives."

"I lived in a golden cage with luxuries that were useless," he said of his childhood. In court, he apologized for his crime and said he wanted to move on and raise his children "in the best way possible."

It's not clear why it took so long for Serafin to be sentenced, but the judge cited his "genuine remorse," the lack of violence in his background, and the outpouring of support from people in his life as reasons for the relatively light term. With the time he has already served, he could be out by September, his lawyer told The Union-Tribune.

'Life ... where you don't see what's going on right next door'

El Chapo Guzman home town

Serafin lived in the shadow of Sinaloa's drug trade, and many others in the state find themselves in inescapable proximity to the narco world and its dangers — though they experience that threat in different ways.

"I think the students that we had were students who do well in school and who have trained themselves not to look and not to see the violence that's going on all around them, and that's something I think that people in the US don't understand," Everard Meade, a professor at the University of San Diego, told Business Insider in December, describing attendees at an event he held with students from Sinaloa the previous month.

"Sinaloa's a wealthy state, and it has really strong institutions," said Meade, who is also the director of USD's Trans Border Institute and frequently travels to Sinaloa. "So where it ranks 30th out of 30 in the Mexico Peace Index in negative peace, or in violence, if you look at positive peace measures — like the institutions of things that actually work — it ranks 10th, and it ranks 10th because it's a wealthy state with a lot of resources and strong institutions."

Such resources give many in Sinaloa — mostly the middle class and up — the opportunity to excel academically and professionally, even as their day-to-day lives play out alongside some of the country's most intense drug-related violence.

Mexico Sinaloa Navolato homicide crime scene police

"There's a cross section of society in Sinaloa that takes advantage of those institutions and trains their kinds how to do the same thing, and if you do well in school and you don't go off this narrow path, you can get a good job there, you can get opportunities to go abroad," Meade said.

"You can do all these things where you can define a successful life in ways where you don't see what's going on right next door, in the neighborhood right next door or what happens three hours before you pulled into the mall parking lot and at the restaurant across the street."

"All these things that have to do with the violence in Sinaloa, people are really good at training themselves not to see it, and there's a class of people — and I'm not just talking about super-rich people. I'm talking about a lot of middle-class people — who really try to train themselves not to see," he added.

Mexico El Mochis Sinaloa students safe house El Chapo Guzman cartel

Such separation is not always possible, Meade said, because at a certain level, the violence becomes unavoidable for all.

The state went through such a period in spring 2017, when internal feuding between cartel factions — one led by a former senior cartel member and his son, another by Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman's sons and "El Mayo" Zambada — spilled out into the open.

"All of a sudden, everybody was back to reality. 'Oh my god, this can affect me. Violence has gotten bad enough that I can't actually turn away from it,'" Meade told Business Insider. "And that definitely happened this spring, and it was this shared sense of anxiety, trepidation, and also uncertainty."

Periods of such violence in Mexico have been well publicized since 2006, when the Mexican government ramped up its campaign against drugs and organized crime. But, Meade said, the cumulative effect on Mexicans — especially in places like Sinaloa, where drug-related violence has been present for much longer — is often overlooked.

"We have a lot data on places that go through a short-term crisis, and the data shows that people are really resilient ... but there's a couple of important limits on that," he said. "It can't go on for more than a few years, and people have to know that there's an end in sight. And that's the thing we've got with the drug war. Now we're past 10 years, and people have no idea if there's an end in sight and what the end would even look like."

"What we've got in Mexico right now is a generation that's coming of age that can't remember what it was like before the drug war."

SEE ALSO: Mexico's dominant cartel is lashing out dissidents and rivals — and it could trigger an avalanche of violence

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What El Chapo is really like — according to the wife of one his closest henchman



source http://www.businessinsider.com/mexico-sinaloa-cartel-boss-el-mayo-zambada-son-grew-up-golden-cage-2018-3

Tinder's parent company is suing Bumble for allegedly copying Tinder's technology, and now Bumble is suing it right back for allegedly copying its core feature

Whitney Wolfe Bumble

  • On Wednesday, Bumble filed a lawsuit against Tinder's parent company, Match Group.
  • The lawsuit alleges that Tinder has plans to copy Bumble's signature "women-make-the-first-move" feature.
  • Match Group filed a lawsuit against Bumble earlier this month, alleging that Bumble had copied most of Tinder's design.

 

On Wednesday, Bumble filed a lawsuit against Tinder's parent company, Match Group, alleging that Tinder has plans  to copy Bumble's signature feature. 

Bumble, which was founded by Tinder co-founder Whitney Wolfe in 2014, requires that women engage first with their male matches. In February, Match Group CEO Mandy Ginsberg confirmed that Tinder would soon introduce the same feature on its app.

"Tinder has lost significant ground and market share to Bumble, a fact that Tinder’s owner, Match, is keenly aware of," the lawsuit alleges. "This is why Tinder recently announced that it intends to copy Bumble’s core women-make-the-first-move feature.''

This isn't the first lawsuit involving Bumble, Tinder, and Match Group. Earlier this month, Match Group filed a suit against Bumble, alleging that Bumble had copied core components of Tinder's design including its double-blind opt in, and swipe right to like and left to dislike functionalities. 

To complicate matters more, there's been reports that Match Group has been hoping to acquire Bumble, and that the lawsuit it filed against Bumble was an alleged attempt to pressure Bumble into selling the company.

Last week, Bumble responded to Match Group's original lawsuit by placing a full-page ad in the New York Times, which said Match Group was attempting to buy, copy, and intimidate Bumble.

Bumble's 22-page lawsuit against Match Group alludes to the convoluted negotiations between the two companies.  "Knowing its lawsuit would immediately kill its negotiations with Bumble, Match deviously asked for, and received,
Bumble’s most sensitive competitive information—without disclosing that it was already planning to sue Bumble," it states. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A neuroscientist explains why reality may just be a hallucination



source http://www.businessinsider.com/bumble-sues-tinder-parent-company-match-group-2018-3

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

A self-driving car was ticketed in San Francisco, but GM-owned Cruise says it did nothing wrong (GM)

A woman gets in a self-driving Chevy Bolt EV car during a media event by Cruise, GM’s autonomous car unit, in San Francisco, California, U.S. November 28, 2017. REUTERS/Elijah Nouvelage

  • A self-driving car owned by General Motors was ticketed Monday for cutting off a woman on a crosswalk.
  • Cruise, which was acquired by GM in 2016, disputes the ticket and says the car was more than 10 feet away from the pedestrian.
  • The ticket comes after a deadly accident in Arizona involving one of Uber's self-driving cars.

A self-driving car owned by General Motors was ticketed in San Francisco Monday after not yielding to pedestrian on a crosswalk, the San Francisco Police Department confirmed to Business Insider.

KPIX, the CBS affiliate in San Francisco, first reported the incident. The pedestrian involved was not harmed.

The ticket comes as scrutiny of self-driving cars is on the rise, following a deadly accident in Tempe, Arizona one week ago involving one of Uber's self-driving vehicles. The incident has reignited the debate over how safe self-driving cars are during testing. 

Giselle Linnane, a SFPD spokeswoman, told Business Insider on Wednesday that the GM vehicle was pulled over in San Francisco's South of Market neighborhood earlier this week after an officer saw the car cut off a woman walking on a crosswalk.  

Cruise, a self-driving car startup acquired by GM in 2016, disputes the ticket according to KPIX, and says its own data shows the pedestrian was far enough way from the vehicle. According to Cruise data, KPIX reported, the pedestrian was 10.8 feet away from the vehicle while in self-driving mode.

Cruise did not respond to request for comment from Business Insider.

"We don't look at or work with that data," Linnane said. "It's whatever the officer observed at the scene and from his observation, there was a violation."

The human test driver, who was in the car at the time and ultimately received the citation, is not at fault and did everything right, Cruise told KPIX. It is unclear if Cruise will attempt to legally fight the ticket.

“Safety is our priority in testing our self-driving vehicles. California law requires the vehicle to yield the right of way to pedestrians, allowing them to proceed undisturbed and unhurried without fear of interference of their safe passage through an intersection. Our data indicates that’s what happened here," a Cruise spokesperson told KPIX.

This isn't the first time a self-driving car has been pulled over by police. In 2015, a Google self-driving car was pulled over in Mountain View for driving too slow.

SEE ALSO: Disturbing footage shows the moments before the fatal Uber self-driving-car crash

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: I quit cable for DirecTV Now and it's saving me over $1,000 a year — here's how I did it



source http://www.businessinsider.com/gm-cruise-self-driving-car-ticket-not-yielding-pedestrian-2018-3

What is gerrymandering?: The Supreme Court heard oral arguments for 2 cases that could overhaul American elections

supreme court

  • The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments on partisan gerrymandering — the justices' second major case of its type in recent months.
  • Gerrymandering refers to the practice of drawing political districts that give one party a lopsided advantage over the other in an election.
  • Justice Anthony Kennedy is viewed as the swing vote in both gerrymandering cases, and the court is expected to issue a ruling in June.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments for the second of two highly anticipated cases within the last six months on partisan gerrymandering — the outcomes of which could essentially overhaul the American election process.

Gerrymandering has become an increasingly divisive issue in recent years, as lower courts have begun striking down what they view as overtly partisan redistricting that tilt elections toward the political parties that draw their districts' maps.

In the first case, Gill v. Whitford, which the justices heard oral arguments for in October, Democrats accused Republicans of benefiting from the practice. In Tuesday's case, Benisek v. Lamone, Republicans accused Democrats.

So far, the justices have shown themselves to be sharply divided over whether they should intervene in instances of extreme gerrymandering. But all eyes are on Justice Anthony Kennedy, who is viewed as the swing vote in the case.

Here's what you need to know:

What is gerrymandering?

Gerrymandering refers to the practice of drawing political districts that give one party a lopsided advantage over the other in an election.

Boundaries for state and federal districts are redrawn every 10 years following the federal census to ensure each district contains roughly the same number of people. Usually, the party in power is the one in control of the redistricting — meaning both Republicans and Democrats have benefited from gerrymandering.

Legislators use two main strategies to gerrymander districts: packing and cracking.

Packing sweeps members of a particular group into one district, so as to allow the other party to win the leftover districts. Cracking does the opposite — it splits a single group across multiple districts, diminishing its voting power.

Another concept, which is at the heart of the case the Supreme Court heard in October, is known as the "efficiency gap." It measures roughly how many votes are determined to be "wasted" — meaning they don't contribute to an election win — as a result of the gerrymandering.

Benisek v. Lamone

Republican voters brought forward the Maryland case. They sued the state after its Democratic lawmakers redrew one of its federal congressional districts in 2011 to remove areas that leaned Republican and add areas that leaned Democratic.

In this case, the plaintiffs argued that the Democrats packed and cracked the state's Sixth District in retaliation for supporting Republican candidates.

The result, the plaintiffs said, was that a Republican candidate who won re-election in 2010 with a 28% margin lost in 2012 by a 21% margin — a major swing in the opposite direction.

The plaintiffs alleged that these tactics violated Republican voters' First Amendment rights because the Democrats "disrupted and depressed Republican political engagement in the area, and manifestly diminished their opportunity for political success."

Gill v. Whitford

The case the justices heard last October concerned a Wisconsin electoral map that the state's Republican-controlled legislature drew after the 2010 census.

That map allowed Republicans to win a whopping 60 of the State Assembly's 99 seats, despite Republican candidates winning just 48.6% of Wisconsin votes statewide. Democratic voters argued that this outcome clearly demonstrated an efficiency gap that disadvantaged the Democratic party.

A three-judge Federal District Court panel sided with Democratic voters after they sued, ruling that the Republican-drawn map unconstitutionally slanted the election in favor of Republicans.

But Wisconsin officials appealed the ruling, arguing that Democratic voters had effectively gerrymandered themselves by packing into cities, whereas Republicans were more evenly distributed throughout the state.

Although the lower court had ordered Wisconsin officials to draw up a new redistricting plan by the fall, the Supreme Court put a hold on that order.

Where do the justices stand on the issue?

Both of the gerrymandering cases before the Supreme Court are widely expected to come down to Justice Kennedy, with the remaining eight justices evenly divided along conservative-liberal lines.

The liberal justices in the past have been inclined to weigh in the constitutionality of extreme partisan gerrymandering, while the conservative ones believe they should avoid interfering in what they view as political disputes.

During opening arguments for the Gill v. Whitford in October, Kennedy appeared skeptical when asking questions of Wisconsin's lawyers, and asked no questions of the lawyer representing Democratic voters, according to media reports.

Some of the more liberal justices also questioned whether allowing Wisconsin's gerrymandering practice to continue would undermine the democratic process itself.

"I would like to ask you what's really behind all of this," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked. "The precious right to vote, if you can stack a legislature in this way, what incentive is there for a voter to exercise his vote? Whether it's a Democratic district or a Republican district, the result — using this map, the result is preordained in most of the districts."

But Ginsburg took a slightly different tone during Wednesday's arguments, The New York Times reported. She, and several other justices, argued that the Maryland case presented multiple logistical hurdles, and that a decision wouldn't be made quickly enough to affect the upcoming 2018 midterm elections.

The justices are expected to issue rulings on both the Maryland and Wisconsin cases in June.

SEE ALSO: How Americans really feel about gun control

DON'T MISS: This Pennsylvania congressional district looks like 'Goofy kicking Donald Duck'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This transgender activist and former Obama White House intern isn't backing down against Trump



source http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-gerrymandering-supreme-court-case-could-overhaul-american-elections-2017-10

'Goonies' actor Corey Feldman says he was stabbed and hospitalized in an 'attempted murder'

Corey feldman

  • "Goonies" actor Corey Feldman said on Twitter that he was stabbed and hospitalized on Tuesday night in Los Angeles.
  • The actor shared pictures of himself in the hospital, adding that we was "OK" and describing the attack as an "attempted homicide."
  • Feldman wrote that he believed the attack was "connected" to "mounting threats" he said he has received on social media, ostensibly in connection to his efforts in exposing Hollywood pedophilia. 

"Goonies" actor Corey Feldman was stabbed and hospitalized Tuesday night in Los Angeles, the actor wrote on Twitter.

Feldman, 46, shared two pictures of himself in a hospital gown on Twitter, adding that we was "OK" and describing the attack as an "attempted homicide."

"IM IN THE HOSPITAL! I WAS ATTACKED 2NITE! A MAN OPENED MY CAR DOOR & STABBED ME W SOMETHING! PLEASE SAY PRAYERS 4 US!," Feldman wrote in the tweet. "THANK GOD IT WAS ONLY MYSELF & MY SECURITY IN THE CAR, WHEN 3 MEN APPROACHED! WHILE SECURITY WAS DISTRACTED, W A GUY A CAR PULLED UP & ATTACKED! I’M OK!"

Feldman went on to write that he believed the attack was "connected" to "mounting threats" he said he has received on social media.

"@LAPD R CURRENTLY INVESTIGATING THE CASE AS AN ATTEMPTED HOMICIDE! I HAVE HAD MOUNTING THREATS ON ALL SM PLATFORMS BY THIS VILE 'WOLFPACK,'" Feldman wrote. "& THIS IM SURE IS A RESULT OF THOSE NEGATIVE ACTIONS! I HAVE REASON 2 BELIEVE ITS ALL CONNECTED! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! HOW SICK R THESE PPL?!?"

Feldman has been talking to the media about his intention to expose Hollywood pedophiles since last year, when he announced he was raising money to make a documentary on the producers he alleged abused him as a child. He said in a video announcing the crowdfunding effort for the documentary in October that he felt had put his life in danger by doing so.

"I had a near-death experience last night where I felt like I was almost going to be killed," Feldman said. "Two trucks came speeding at me at the same time on a crosswalk. And then several of my band members decided to quit because they decided they were afraid for their lives."

In November, the LAPD launched and later dropped an investigation into Feldman's allegations of sexual abuse from his childhood, saying that the alleged incident was "out of statute," according to California law.

SEE ALSO: R Kelly accused of sexual misconduct with a 14-year-old girl he was keeping as a 'pet'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why 555 is always used for phone numbers on TV and in movies



source http://www.businessinsider.com/corey-feldman-says-he-was-stabbed-and-hospitalized-in-attempted-murder-2018-3

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Meet the high-profile lawyer representing Stormy Daniels in her lawsuit against Trump — who learned from the guy who sued OJ Simpson and races sports cars professionally

michael avenatti Stormy Daniels Lawyer

At the moment, Michael Avenatti may be the most high-profile lawyer in America. The 47-year-old seasoned litigator has made headlines in recent weeks thanks to his client, adult film actress and director Stormy Daniels.

Just days before the 2016 US election, a lawyer for President Donald Trump arranged a $130,000 payment to Daniels to keep her silent about an affair she allegedly had with Trump in 2006.

Avenatti has since sued the president, on Daniels' behalf, accusing Trump of invalidating a non-disclosure agreement. Avenatti says the violation allows Daniels to reveal her side of the story to the public, and on Sunday, she did just that in a blockbuster "60 Minutes" interview on CBS News.

As Daniels' profile has risen, so has Avenatti's. Here's what you should know about him:

SEE ALSO: Meet 'Stormy Daniels', the porn star Trump's lawyer paid to keep quiet about an alleged sexual affair — who's finally telling her side of the story

DON'T MISS: Trump's personal lawyer admits he paid a former porn star $130,000 but says the money came out of his own pocket

Avenatti graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1996. Three years later, he received his JD degree from George Washington University.



During college and law school, Avenatti worked for The Research Group, a campaign research firm founded by Rahm Emmanuel, former President Barack Obama's chief of staff and the current Democratic mayor of Chicago.

Source: Chicago Magazine



After graduating law school, Avenatti worked at O'Melveny & Myers, a high-powered Los Angeles law firm. Over the course of his legal career, he has contributed to several high-profile cases involving Paris Hilton, Jim Carrey, and members of the rock band The Eagles.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source http://www.businessinsider.com/michael-avenatti-bio-lawyer-representing-stormy-daniels-2018-3

An FBI official was worried that James Comey gave Congress 'inaccurate testimony' — and it sparked a huge probe into the locked San Bernardino iPhone (AAPL)

Tim Cook

  • The FBI did not exhaust possible options before trying to compel Apple to unlock an iPhone used in a 2015 shooting.
  • That's according to a new report from a Department of Justice internal watchdog. 
  • The findings could weaken the government's push for tech companies to build special tools for law enforcement to unlock smartphones.


Two years ago, the FBI was trying to extract all the data from the iPhone owned by Syed Farook, the gunman who killed 14 people during an attack in San Bernardino, California. There was one problem — the phone had a passcode and Farook had died in a shootout with the police. The FBI went to court to compel Apple, the maker of the iPhone 5C, to help it access the data.

Apple fought back, CEO Tim Cook posted an open letter on Apple.com, and the whole affair became international news before the FBI said that actually, it didn't need Apple's help to crack the device anyway — it found a vendor that could do the job. 

Now, a new report from the Inspector General of the Justice Department takes a closer look at the internal FBI deliberations from those months in late 2015 and early 2016, and it even suggests that the FBI could have done more to break into the phone before trying to force Apple to help. 

The report is full of acronyms and jargon, but one thing is clear — the FBI could have done more to exhaust all options before turning to Apple. Specifically, it should have checked with an internal group, called "Remote Operations Unit," that works to build or buy tools to break into devices. 

The technical group working with the investigation "should have checked with ... trusted vendors for possible solutions before advising ... that there was no other technical alternative and that compelling Apple's assistance was necessary to search the Farook iPhone," the report found. 

Here's a critical passage from the report: 

"We believe all of these disconnects resulted in a delay in seeking and obtaining vendor assistance that ultimately proved fruitful, and that as a result of the belatedly-obtained technical solution, the government was required to withdraw from its previously stated position that it could not access the iPhone in this critical case, and by implication in other cases, without first compelling cooperation from the manufacturer."

Basically — the group inside the FBI that breaks into mobile devices only began seeking outside assistance to crack the Farook iPhone right before the FBI demanded Apple's help in February 2016. (The public still doesn't know who was eventually able to crack the iPhone.)

The report was written because a senior FBI official was worried that both she and then-FBI Director James Comey may have given "inaccurate testimony to Congress on the FBI capabilities."

The official, Amy Hess, was called "the woman in charge of the FBI's most controversial high-tech tools" by the Washington Post, and she testified in front of Congress on April 16, 2016, less than a month after the FBI was able to crack the phone. 

"Hess expressed concern about an alleged disagreement between units within the FBI Operational Technology Division (OTD) over the 'capabilities available to the national security programs' to access the Farook iPhone following its seizure, and concerns that this may have resulted in her or Comey giving inaccurate testimony to Congress on the FBI’s capabilities," according to the report. 

The report's conclusions may make it harder for government officials to force companies to crack encrypted devices in the future. If the bureau doesn't exhaust all options, why should big tech companies build special back doors for law enforcement? 

That's a particularly timely question. The New York Times reports that a new effort to force Apple and similar companies to build special software for law enforcement is brewing. Current efforts inside the government are focused on a new, safe way to unlock data on encrypted devices. 

Apple is already pushing back. In a statement published with the New York Times story, Apple's top engineering executive, Craig Federighi, said that those kind of proposals "inject new and dangerous weaknesses into product security."

Then he mentioned that the people who run critical infrastructure need secure iPhones, too. 

“Weakening security makes no sense when you consider that customers rely on our products to keep their personal information safe, run their businesses or even manage vital infrastructure like power grids and transportation systems.”

Read the entire report below: 

SEE ALSO: Private texts show FBI agents thought Tim Cook was a 'hypocrite' in the San Bernardino iPhone encryption fight

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A neuroscientist explains why reality may just be a hallucination



source http://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-could-have-done-more-before-forcing-apple-to-crack-the-iphone-justice-department-report-2018-3

An Apple facility that repairs iPhones in California called 9-1-1 over 2,000 times in 4 months — and nobody knows how to stop it (AAPL)

Apple Sacramento

  • A string of false 911 calls from an Apple repair facility has plagued a small city near Sacramento for months.
  • The calls appear to originate from iPhones being repaired, and at one point tied up all six emergency lines for the city of Elk Grove, California.
  • The city has worked with Apple to resolve the problem, but has been frustrated by Apple's inability to stop the phones from calling its emergency lines.


A small city near Sacramento has been dealing with a never-ending string of false emergency calls from an Apple repair facility in town. 

Between October 20, 2017 and February 23, 2018, the police department in Elk Grove, California received 2,028 calls on its 911 lines originating from the Apple facility — an average of 16 calls per day.

At one point in January, the calls from the Apple factory were so frequent that they tied up every single one of Elk Grove's six 911 lines, according to public documents reviewed by Business Insider. 

"They lit us up like a Christmas tree," one dispatcher wrote in in an email to other dispatchers.

It was obvious to Elk Grove police that the 911 calls were not real emergencies, but rather, the equivalent of accidental “butt dials,” mysteriously ringing the city's hotline on an assembly-line scale. For whatever reason, many of the iPhones being repaired at the Apple facility were going rogue and dialing 911. But for city officials trying to stop the nuisance and to ensure that a critical emergency resource was not overburdened, fixing the problem has not been easy.

Despite crediting Apple for being responsive to their pleas for help, Elk Grove officials have been frustrated by the company's inability to fix the problem. At one point, officials even discussed the possibility of getting the state government involved and sending police to the factory. 

The Apple facility is a point of pride in the city of 170,000, providing the kinds of manufacturing jobs that many American towns are clamoring for. But the city’s experience grappling with the 911 ghost calls also illustrates the unexpected challenges in hosting a branch of a multinational corporation whose business is built on secrecy and innovation. 

The 911 calls, which are usually silent or have have background noise on the line, came to light one month ago, when a local CBS affiliate reported on the influx of 911 calls. Despite subsequent international attention, the problem is ongoing one month later, but has significantly decreased, Jason Jimenez, Elk Grove's public information officer, told Business Insider. 

"The calls have not stopped but have significantly decreased. We are continuing to work with Apple in hopes of resolving the issue," Jimenez said in a statement on Monday. Jimenez previously said in February that "at this point, public safety is not in danger" from the affair. 

"We’re aware of 9-1-1 calls originating from our Elk Grove repair and refurbishment facility. We take this seriously and we are working closely with local law enforcement to investigate the cause to ensure this doesn’t continue," an Apple representative told Business Insider on Tuesday. 

The cause 

Apple distribution centers in SacramentoThe sudden influx of 911 calls last fall led to a minor crisis at Elk Grove police department. They knew the calls came from Apple — but one problem was that given Apple's secrecy, nobody knew where the calls were coming from in the facilities. Not even Apple.

In a email sent to Elk Grove dispatchers on February 21, an Elk Grove manager said that she had weekly conference calls with Apple Global Security, and had narrowed it down to an issue with "iPhone 8, 8 Plus, X and the Apple Watch."

The manager wrote that Apple said that simply turning off emergency calls for an unactivated phone was not an option, because of FCC regulations. The calls are described as "NSI" (non-service initialized) calls in the Elk Grove reports, because they originate from devices that haven't yet been activated.

While the calls were typically short, and dispatchers were able to quickly identify them, many at Elk Grove's dispatch center worried about their effect. 

When Elk Grove escalated the issue, a state official said the issue put the community at risk. 

California's office of emergency services' 9-1-1 manager "took the stance that each one of these calls put the community at risk since the Complaint taker could be delayed when answering a real call due to NSI," the Elk Grove manager wrote in a February 26 email. "While that is technically true if the worst scenario occurred‐ with our staffing levels, and very high answering rates that is not something that I have focused on. My focus is the busy out of all the trunks."

On January 17, all six "trunks" were occupied at one time, according to a report from the 9-1-1 service provider. That would have meant that anyone trying to call 911 at that particular time might have received a busy signal. 

1-17 calls

New packaging

What exactly has been causing the phones under repair to make the ghost calls continues to be an enigma, though some kind of problem with the packaging that might cause buttons on the phones to be pressed is the main suspect.

"Apple has done the following in an attempt to try and mitigate these calls: Changed their packaging twice. Unfortunately, the first change did not yield a decrease in these calls. We are currently waiting on the next order of 30,000 new packaging trays to arrive and be used in production to see if this will help," the Elk Grove dispatch manager wrote.

"They are looking into the possibility of creating and purchasing cell phone sleeves that disable all cell phone service to place the phones in prior to shipping," she continued. "They are actively working with their programming team to see how to prevent this issue on future phone and watch releases."

An internal December 28 report gives some more detail about what Apple thought the problem may be.

Debbie Berger, an Apple Global Security Officer "thought the issue was narrowed down to packaging on the new iPhone 8 which was recently launched, or the storage trays the new iPhones were placed on at the facility. Since the new phones were a bit bigger, it was believed the phone pressed up against the side of the box when stacked, causing it to call 9-1-1," Elk Grove dispatch supervisor Jamie Hudson wrote. Apple told him that they were manufacturing new storage trays, he wrote. 

However, the trays didn't help, according to the internal report, and the police department was frustrated that the packaging redesign didn't work. With the help of Elk Grove's city manager, they were able to get in touch with Mike Foulkes, Apple's government liaison, at the end of January, months after the calls had started. 

Apple eventually agreed to a process with the Elk Grove PD where a stray 911 call would be transferred back to Apple so that they could identify the problem inside its facility. This process quickly confirmed one 911 call came from an iPhone 8 Plus on the "north wall iPhone repair line" in February, and was caused by "the side buttons being held together while phones were placed next to each other." 

Still, no one has yet been able to pinpoint the reason for the ghost calls in the records Business Insider reviewed.

The original iMac 

imacThe documents also show the careful balancing act municipalities have to strike with Apple, which is much larger and more powerful than the cities and counties where it decides to settle. 

Apple wants discretion and coordination from the cities it settles in; local governments are often more concerned with making sure the city is properly functioning.

Apple's Elk Grove warehouse is one of Apple's older satellite facilities. It's been there since 1991, and used to be a manufacturing facility for Macs — including the iconic candy-colored iMac — before Apple outsourced its manufacturing to Asia.

In 2015, though, it started growing rapidly once again, and added hundreds of workers who officially worked for Pegatron Technology Services fixing iPhones, according to the Mercury News. Now the facility services 30,000 phones per day, according to the Elk Grove records.

Apple in recent months has made a big effort to highlight the jobs it creates in the United States. Apple announced last year plans to build a new campus and hire 20,000 additional employees. The actual location of the facility hasn't been announced yet

No matter where Apple's new campus ends up being located, those city officials should hope that Apple CEO Tim Cook doesn't forget about them after the ribbon is cut. As revealed by the Elk Grove 911 dispatchers, companies the size of Apple can have some very unexpected side effects on the towns they decide to locate in. 

SEE ALSO: Stanford computer-science students want Apple to make a mode for the iPhone that allows only calls, texts, and photos

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Facebook can still track you even if you delete your account — here's how to stop it



source http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-facility-in-elk-grove-keeps-calling-911-documents-2018-3

Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly preparing to testify before Congress (FB)

Mark Zuckerberg

  • Facing increasing pressure to testify on the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal, CNN reports that Mark Zuckerberg is now preparing to speak to Congress about the issue.
  • The Facebook CEO has been invited to an April 10th hearing on data privacy.


Mark Zuckerberg is preparing to testify before Congress, CNN reported Tuesday, citing anonymous sources.

Over the past week, the Facebook CEO has faced increasing pressure to speak to Congress, and now he is reportedly readying his testimony regarding how Facebook handles its privacy and user data in wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Zuckerberg, who remained silent on the matter for five days following the first reports from The New York Times and The Guardian about the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal, has since apologized and given multiple interviews on the matter, in addition to publishing a post on Facebook detailing upcoming changes to Facebook's data policies.

Zuckerberg has been invited by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley to attend an April 10 hearing on data privacy. Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey have also been invited.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: I quit cable for DirecTV Now and it's saving me over $1,000 a year — here's how I did it



source http://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-is-preparing-to-testify-before-congress-report-2018-3

Monday, March 26, 2018

Facebook stock plunges 5% after FTC confirms it's investigating the company's privacy practices in wake of Cambridge Analytica scandal

Mark Zuckerberg

  • The Federal Trade Commission publicly confirmed on Monday that it is investigating Facebook as a result of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
  • Facebook has been in hot water after news reports revealed that Cambridge Analytic had illicitly obtained data on up to 50 million users and used that data to influence voters towards Donald Trump in the US presidential election, as well as to influence the Brexit vote.
  • This isn't the first time the FTC  has investigated its privacy practices. The agency looked into the company's practices several years ago and found them wanting. In 2011, Facebook entered into an agreement with the FTC that regulated how it treated its users privacy.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Monday said that it is officially investigating Facebook. 

The FTC publicly confirmed the investigation after several news outlets reported on the probe last week, citing unnamed sources.

Facebook stock was down as much as 5% following news of the FTC probe.

Facebook has attracted the FTC's scrutiny over the Cambridge Analytica (CA) scandal. CA is a political marketing firm that illicitly obtained data on up to 50 million Facebook users, unknown to those users, and used that data to influence voters towards Donald Trump in the US presidential election and the Brexit vote.

The problem for Facebook is that this isn't the first time the FTC  has investigated its privacy practices. The agency looked into the company's practices several years ago and found them wanting. In 2011, Facebook entered into an agreement with the FTC that regulated how it treated its users' privacy.

With this latest investigation, the FTC will be looking at two main factors: Did Facebook violate any FTC regulations with its dealings with Cambridge Analytica? And did the social media company violate its 2011 agreement with the FTC?

This is coming amidst increasing calls, even from powerful people in Silicon Valley, that Facebook, and perhaps other internet companies, need to be regulated. And in the meantime, more is being revealed about just how much data Facebook has quietly been collecting on its users, including new reports that it had tracked some Android users' phone use.

Here's the official statement confirming the FTC's investigation. It references Privacy Shield, a framework between the US and Europe for how personal data must be treated by tech companies when it travels from one country to another.

"The FTC is firmly and fully committed to using all of its tools to protect the privacy of consumers. Foremost among these tools is enforcement action against companies that fail to honor their privacy promises, including to comply with Privacy Shield, or that engage in unfair acts that cause substantial injury to consumers in violation of the FTC Act. Companies who have settled previous FTC actions must also comply with FTC order provisions imposing privacy and data security requirements. Accordingly, the FTC takes very seriously recent press reports raising substantial concerns about the privacy practices of Facebook. Today, the FTC is confirming that it has an open non-public investigation into these practices."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How a woman from the 1800s became the first computer programmer



source http://www.businessinsider.com/ftc-confirms-that-it-is-investigating-facebook-2018-3

Sunday, March 25, 2018

The world's largest Coke bottler is shutting down operations in one of Mexico's most violent states because of constant attacks

AP_135644730110

  • The world's largest bottler of Coke shuttered its operations in a town in southwest Mexico on Friday.
  • Coca-Cola Femsa said the shutdown was prompted by constant aggression from organized-crime groups.
  • Attacks on big companies and multinationals have been rare in Mexico in the decade since the country ramped up its war on drugs and organized crime.

Coca-Cola Femsa, the world's largest Coke bottler, said on Friday it was indefinitely shutting down operations in Ciudad Altamirano, a town at the northern edge of Mexico's Guerrero state, because of harassment from organized crime and a lack of response by authorities.

"The measure was taken to put first the security of more than 160 workers who work in the distribution center," the firm said in a release. "The lack of necessary conditions to operate in an efficient and secure manner in this zone ... as well as the recent unjustified aggression toward one of our workers, led the company to make this decision."

The firm said it "rejects energetically all violent action against its workers, families, and communities where it operates. It laments profoundly that the absence of rule of law and the prevalence of impunity that affects the region."

Coca-Cola Femsa is a joint venture between Coca-Cola and Fomento Economico Mexicano, which owns 47% of the venture.

Since January, Coca-Cola Femsa workers in Altamirano have received "constant threats and aggression" from organized-crime groups, which also affected its facilities, the firm said.

Mexico Guerrero Coca Cola Femsa bottles soft drink soda

Guerrero state government spokesman Ricardo Alvarez Heredia said that early Friday morning police stopped an attack on a Coca-Cola Femsa facility in the area, exchanging fire with 20 armed men who tried to force their way into a compound belonging to the company. The attackers fled, but authorities seized a pickup truck, a firearm, and Molotov cocktails, "with which they intended to set fire to the soft-drink facility," Alvarez Heredia said. One person was arrested.

On Wednesday, gunmen opened fire on workers who were reopening the plant's sales section, which had been closed since January because of extortion threats. One worker was wounded.

Alvarez Heredia told Expansion that authorities had meetings with operators from businesses in the area because of insecurity. He said he did not know if the state governor had spoken with businesses from the area, but he said the state and federal government had reinforced security there at the request of businesses.

Coca-Cola Femsa has previously encountered similar problems elsewhere in the state.

Mexico Guerrero homicide crime scene

In mid-2015, it suspended operations at its plant in Arcelia because of threats from organized crime.

In March that year, the firm closed its warehouse in the state capital, Chilpancingo, for two weeks amid violence in the aftermath of the September 2014 abduction of 43 students from the Ayotzinapa school, most of whom have yet to be found.

In August 2014, the firm shut down operations in Arcelia because of harassment from organized-crime groups, mainly cells of the Familia Michoacana, which were attempting to take control of the area.

Smaller companies and businesses in Mexico have frequently faced extortion and violence the years since the country's war on drugs and organized crime ramped up in 2006, but attacks on big companies and multinationals have been rare.

Attacks on trucks and warehouses belonging to PepsiCo brand Sabritas in mid-2014 were thought to be the first to directly target a global company. Foreign firms continue to invest in Mexico, though they often favor areas with lower levels of violence.

Guerrero is one of Mexico's poorest and most violent states. The region where Ciudad Altamirano is located, called Tierra Caliente, is especially lawless. It has become a hub for drug production and trafficking, and a number of criminal groups are present there.

Statewide, homicides increased 14% between 2016 and 2017. The state's homicide rate also rose over that period, from 61.67 homicides per 100,000 people in 2016 to 64.26 last year — both among the highest in the country. Guerrero was home to six of the 50 most violent municipalities in Mexico in 2017, including Acapulco, a once idyllic tourist hotspot that was named the third-most violent city in the world last year.

SEE ALSO: Mexico's surging narco violence is intensifying at the edges of one of its biggest tourist hotspots

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how much sugar is in your favorite drinks



source http://www.businessinsider.com/coca-cola-femsa-leaving-altamirano-guerrero-mexico-because-of-attacks-2018-3

Colombia is trying to root out the cocaine trade, but farmers are relying on it as an 'insurance policy'

Colombia is trying to root out the cocaine trade, but farmers are relying on it as an 'insurance policy'

SEE ALSO: US officials are raising alarm over Colombia's cocaine boom, but they may be 'missing most of the picture'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The wives of high-level cocaine traffickers reveal how their husbands took down 'El Chapo'



source http://www.businessinsider.com/farmers-in-colombia-relying-on-economic-benefits-of-cocaine-production-2018-3

Friday, March 23, 2018

Taylor Swift shared a rare political statement in support of gun control: 'No one should have to go to school in fear'

Hackers are holding the city of Atlanta’s computer systems for ransom, causing massive outages — and anyone who has conducted business with the city is at risk

atlanta

  • A ransomware attack on the city of Atlanta's government created outages for many consumer-facing and internal applications, putting "everyone who has done business" with the city at risk, according to a report from NBC's Atlanta affiliate WXIA.
  • The hackers are demanding a bitcoin payment of $6,800 to unlock each computer, or $51,000 for a system-wide fix. 
  • Mayor Keisha Bottoms held a press conference to say that, though the extent of the breach is questionable, the FBI, Homeland Security, Cisco, and Microsoft are all involved with the investigation to help get to the bottom of it.

A ransomware attack on the city of Atlanta's government on Thursday morning led to outages of a number of internal and customer-facing applications, as reported by 11Alive.

Senior officials have advised both businesses and consumers to monitor their bank accounts, saying anyone who has conducted business with the city is at risk. 

Internally, the systems affected include the city's payroll application, according to an internal email from the city's information technology department that was shared with Atlanta's NBC affiliate WXIA. The email instructed employees to unplug their computers if anything seemed suspicious.

In a ransomware attack, hackers place malware on a computer — or system of computers — that restricts access, and then demand payment to undo it. Petya in 2016 and WannaCry in 2017 were both examples of ransomware that happened at a global scale. 

The hacker of the Atlanta attack is reportedly demanding a bitcoin payment of $6,800 to unlock each computer, or $51,000 for the keys to fix the whole system, according to a message sent to a city employee who shared it with WXIA.

Paying the ransom doesn't necessarily mean the keys that the hackers give IT will fix the issue, in which case Atlanta would be forced to rebuild its systems.

Mayor Keisha Bottoms held a press conference later that day, in which she admitted that officials weren't sure of the extent of the attack at the time, but ensured that they were doing what they could to address it.

"My senior team essentially is here, so this should give you an idea of the importance of today's press conference," she said.

Bottoms also said that Atlanta's information management team is meeting with the FBI and Homeland security, and that both Cisco and Microsoft are also involved in the investigation. 

Atlanta's COO Richard Cox ensured the public that city payroll, public safety, water and airport operations departments have not been affected, and Bottoms ensured has.

The 16-minute press conference was shared to Twitter:

Coincidentally, a number of sites used to pay for MARTA — Atlanta's public transportation system — experienced outages, but a spokesperson informed 11Alive that those were unrelated.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What it's actually like to hear voices in your head



source http://www.businessinsider.com/atlanta-ransomware-attack-consumers-businesses-2018-3

Thursday, March 22, 2018

Do polygraphs work and should we keep using them?

You’ve probably seen this device before.  This is a “polygraph” -- which is more popularly known as a lie detector test. But just how often it can catch you in a lie is shrouded in controversy.

Regardless, thousands of polygraphs are given each year in the US, alone, for everything from government clearance screening to witness verification. And the power of these machine’s results is not taken lightly. People have reportedly lost their jobs and even reputations over a failed exam. But how exactly does this machine work, and is it really as accurate as polygraph examiners claim?

To find out, we decided to put the polygraphs to the test ourselves. Polygraph results haven’t been accepted in most state courts since 1923. Mainly because:

Francis Shen: “The scientific research suggests that the polygraph has significant scientific problems. That is, it may not give us the level of accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity that we think it will, and that could be problematic.”

Still, many defenders contest that even though the polygraph isn’t 100% accurate, neither is DNA testing or eye-witness testimonies.

Lisa Gentile: "Do you intend to answer each question truthfully?"

Jessica Orwig: "Yes."

Now what the examiner may, or may not know, is that I’ve already told my first lie.

Lisa Gentile: "Have you used any illegal drugs in the last three years?"

Jessica Orwig: "No."

Lisa Gentile: "Did you ever commit a serious crime? Were you ever terminated from a job that you did not disclose? In your whole life did you ever do something you're ashamed of? In your whole life did you ever lose your temper? Are the lights on in this room?"

Ok, the test is over. Let's see if she caught my lie.

Lisa Gentile: "You're more relaxed, it goes down. Then when it begins here it goes back up again, so that's a lie."

So, yup, the polygraph caught me.

Now to be clear, this type of test is normally administered for a job interview, meaning the stakes are lower and the accuracy rate is lower. And it caught me anyway. But it’s hard to know if this is the case for your average person.

Even though I worked on controlling my breathing, what really got me was my increased heartbeat, perspiration, and blood pressure. So who knows what would have happened if I spent time learning how to maintain those things? And that uncertainty is pretty much why polygraphs aren't accepted in most states because it's known that people have and can beat the polygraph.

Francis Shen: “I’m of two minds about the polygraph. I have serious reservations about it use. But I can see that it might have some utility in some but not all contexts and I think we need to be pretty conservative and cautious about its use.”

Join the conversation about this story »



source http://www.businessinsider.com/do-polygraphs-work-lie-detectors-2018-3

The US dropped charges against Turkish officers involved in DC brawl 2 days before Tillerson had an unusual meeting with Erdogan

recep tayyip erdogan turkey protest washington

  • Federal prosecutors dismissed charges against 11 of 15 members of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's security team charged in connection with a May 2017 street brawl in Washington DC. 
  • The charges dropped on February 14 came just the day before former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson flew to Ankara and met with Erdogan.
  • But US officials have denied the charges were dropped for political reasons. 

Federal prosecutors have decided to dismiss charges against 11 of 15 members of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's security team after they were charged in connection with a street brawl in May 2017 near the Turkish embassy in Washington.

A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District Columbia confirmed that his office filed motions to dismiss charges against seven of the defendants on February 14, and against four others in November of last year.

Eleven people, including one police officer, were injured in the May 2017 brawl outside the Turkish Embassy in Washington DC. Many of the injured were US citizens, and a previously published video appears to have shown Erdogan's security guards attacking protestors after speaking with him. 

The charges dropped on February 14 came just the day before former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson flew to Ankara and met with Erdogan, according to CNN. 

Rex Tillerson Recep Tayyip Erdogan

During the talks between Tillerson and Erdogan, the former secretary of state told the Turkish leader that the dropped charges were an example of how the US had addressed their grievances, according to the Wall Street Journal. 

Turkey has been upset with the US since at least 2016 after it refused to extradite Fetullah Gulen, who has been accused of fomenting the attempted coup that year, and starting arming Kurdish forces in Syria, which Turkey views as an extension of the PKK. 

CNN also reported that Tillerson wasn't accompanied with a translator, aides or note-takers. 

At the same time, US officials said the charges were dropped because investigators misidentified some of the suspects and didn't have enough evidence on others, WSJ reported. 

Assault charges are still pending against four remaining members of Erdogan's security team: Ismail Dalkiran, Servet Erkan, Ahmet Karabay, and Mehmet Sarman.

SEE ALSO: Video appears to show Turkish President Erodgan ordering security to beat peaceful protesters on US soil

Join the conversation about this story »



source http://www.businessinsider.com/r-us-drops-assault-charges-against-11-of-turkish-presidents-security-team-2018-3