Saturday, September 29, 2018

I covered murders during Chicago's deadliest year in decades – here's what I saw

Chicago crime scene

In 2016, Chicago experienced 780 homicides, making it the deadliest year in the city in nearly two decades.

The first homicide of the year came at 2:20 a.m. on New Year's Day in the Grand Boulevard neighborhood on the South Side. Twenty-year-old DeAndre Holiday found himself on the wrong side of an argument half a mile from the edge of Washington Park when a man pulled out a handgun and shot him in the chest.

I got there just as the police were stringing up yellow tape around the scene.

I was a crime reporter for the Chicago Sun-Times then, tracking a never-ending string of shootings and violence. For more than a year, I had a police scanner near my desk and listened to the dispatcher say "we're getting a ticket of a person shot" and "shots fired," among other depressing crimes.

I was working the overnight shift that night, as I usually did, when the call went out over the scanner. "One of us should go," my coworker said.

When I got to the scene, it was silent, and a bitter wind ran through my overcoat. I walked up to the line looking for Holiday's body then saw it mangled in the street, partially covered by a white sheet.

One of the cops asked me to step back because the police were tying up an extra line. I walked to the darkened sidewalk and watched the tape blow in the wind and the blue lights bounce off the brick homes and disappear into abandoned lots.

The silence didn't last. One by one, I watched Holiday's friends and family members arrive in disbelief, then see his body. Devastation and raw emotion quickly overwhelmed them.

chicago homicide

One woman kept screaming, "Who shot him? That's my baby's daddy!" A woman who appeared to be in her 70s wailed over and over "Wake up!" She shrieked and screamed in a way I'd never heard before, as did the dozen or so others. Sometimes it was as if everyone were screaming at once.

The cops moved an SUV in front of Holiday's body, and an officer took the older woman's hand and led her away. At one point, gunshots rang out a few blocks away. No one — not the police or the friends or family — looked surprised.

That wasn't the first shooting I went to, but it was the first where I had witnessed such devastation. I thought I knew how to handle myself after scenes like that, but when I got home, back to the world I'd known before, I felt numb.

A look I'll never forget

Last year, more than 4,000 people were shot in Chicago, and shootings have become so normalized that they rarely make the front page of the local papers, let alone the national news.

About a month after Holiday's killing, as the Super Bowl was playing and my friends were posting pictures of their parties on social media, I was in the Sun-Times newsroom listening to the scanner scrolling through police zones.

"All right, we're getting four people shot now," the dispatcher said. I pressed hold on the zone and listened. The dispatcher said the victims were all 15 years old. My editor told me not to go to the scene — no one was dead yet. But then I told her the ages.

I raced my car down the highway to the Englewood neighborhood, also on the South Side, where the shooting had happened. I found a woman who looked to be in her 30s standing on the sidewalk with a dazed disposition.

chicago crime homicide

She told me she ran outside after hearing gunfire and kids screaming and found eight or nine teenagers on a porch. Four of them — three boys and a girl — were shot, and all were crying. Some were throwing up. Thankfully, they all survived.

One of the kids told her that two men had walked up, asked "Are y'all good?" and then opened fire.

I could see fear and trauma in her eyes. As she talked to me, her kids peeked out from behind the white curtain of their first-floor apartment. They looked terrified too. I'll never forget that. I sensed that they were scared not only because of the shooting but also because she was talking to me, a journalist.

The neighbor seemed nervous to talk to me too. She asked me not to use her name, like most witnesses I talked to after shootings, and spoke quietly, as though she wanted to make sure no one heard her.

It was only later that I learned the hard way that even appearing to give information to a journalist could be dangerous.

'You tryna get me killed?'

A few months later, I was in the office very late one day, or early, depending on how you look at it. I heard on the scanner that a male had been shot in the head. The dispatcher didn't call it a 0110 — the Chicago police code for homicide — but it sounded like one. I drove to the scene to find out.

Chicago homicide

When I got there, a body was in the middle of the street, and there were only a few people around. I asked a guy walking down the sidewalk whether he knew what happened, and he told me something about where the shooters were standing.

"Over there?" I asked, pointing to a trash can.

"F--- you, man," he said. "You tryna get me killed?"

He stormed off. It dawned on me that, with one flick of the wrist, I may have put him, and possibly myself, in danger. I felt awful.

When I finally got to sleep that night, I dreamed that someone kept pointing a gun at me. I woke up screaming. I rushed to my computer, and there in my inbox was an email from a family member of the victim. The person was swearing at and threatening me.

I couldn't get the screams out of my head

By July, I was having trouble relating to my friends and family.

One night, I headed to a homicide scene in the neighborhood of Austin on the West Side. The trees were covering the city's notoriously golden street lamps, and it was really dark. The police had just taken the victim's body away and were taking down the yellow tape. I walked over to an older woman standing on the sidewalk.

chicago crime homicide

When she and I finished talking, I walked over to three men standing on the side of the house where the victim had been killed. I had my camera on my shoulder and motioned as if I wanted to ask them some questions.

One of the men took one look at me and said, "You better get the f--- out of here." Another put his hand in his pants as though he had a gun holstered there. I had a sudden realization that all of the police officers had left the scene. The three of them started cursing at me and walking forward.

My heart started racing. I said "All right" and turned and walked at a brisk but steady pace to my car, trying to show neither fear nor disrespect. When I got to my car, I looked back and saw them down the street, still yelling at me. I felt stupid as hell.

I had been feeling weird since the New Year's Day shooting. For a day or two after visiting a scene, I would feel this peculiar kind of tunnel vision. It was as though I were looking at the world through a foggy television screen. I couldn't touch or focus on anything.

I couldn't get the screams out of my head. While they were all different, they were also all the same: the pain of losing someone to violence.

Few people in my life understood what was going on.

The socioeconomics of murder

It wasn't just the screams or the violence that made the scenes hard to process. The causes of violence were readily on display at almost every scene.

chicago crime homicide

Most shootings in Chicago happen in about 10 of the city's 77 neighborhoods, on the South Side and the West Side. Poverty, racism, lack of opportunities, and more were apparent at every scene, even in the smallest details. It made the suffering harder to process.

When I'd drive from the Sun-Times office downtown to the crime scenes, it was hard to miss the contrasts. The skyscrapers, plush condos, and designer stores gave way to run-down buildings, boarded-up schools and storefronts, and empty lots.

At one crime scene, where a 28-year-old had been shot dead on a sidewalk, a young boy walked up and down the sidewalk along the police tape. No older than 7, he would stop and stare at the body every so often. As far as I could tell, it seemed normal to him.

Another shooting I covered happened at a memorial event. Nearly 100 people had gathered to remember a friend killed on the block a few years prior when a man pulled out a gun and killed a man and a woman and injured two more. A 16-year-old girl at the memorial had an asthma attack during the shooting and died later at the hospital.

At another, a 16-year-old boy was shot in his car after a man walked up and asked where he was from. "I'm not about that," the boy's friends told me he said. The man pulled out a gun and shot him in the head.

"I just bought him a plane ticket to Mississippi, and now he's dead," the boy’s mother told me.

It just felt as if bodies were piling up in my head.

Tired

This is just a small fraction of the scenes I saw in Chicago.

What's awful is that what I saw pales in comparison to what some reporters in the city have seen. And it certainly pales in comparison to what the victims, their families, and all those living in Chicago's hardest-hit neighborhoods have experienced.

chicago crime homicide

But by the time I put my two weeks in, I was tired of living in the dark.

I was tired of having to take two or three Xanax to fall asleep, only to black out and then suddenly wake up four hours later in a feverish sweat.

I was tired of the regular nightmares — my girlfriend at the time told me I would frequently scream in my sleep.

I was tired of hearing the dispatcher say, "We're getting a ticket of a person shot. Person shot."

I was tired of the constant guilt and I was tired of being threatened and screamed at by the people I was trying to help — though I certainly didn't blame them for their anger and emotion.

It's been about eight months since I quit, and I'm still processing what I saw. I still get flashes of bodies or hear screams when I see flashing police lights or a broken car window.

I think sometimes about how that year affected me — how it made me feel numb, how I wore a scowl I couldn't seem to shake.

Then I think about what I might be like if I grew up in one of those neighborhoods I went to so often.

SEE ALSO: We spent 3 nights with a NYC crime reporter to see how safe the 'safest big city' in the US really is

SEE ALSO: 'The worst I've ever seen it': 11 shot dead, 63 more wounded in Chicago over the weekend

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 outdoor adventures that are worth the hike



source https://www.businessinsider.com/what-i-saw-crime-reporter-chicago-2017-7

The 27 countries in the world with the most freedom

Sweden Swedish Fans

Freedom means different things to different people.

But Freedom House, an independent watchdog organization that releases an annual report on freedom around the world, measures it in terms of civil liberties and political rights. 

Their annual report, Freedom in the World, "operates from the assumption that freedom for all people is best achieved in liberal democratic societies."

In 2018, more than 130 in-house and external analysts and advisers from academia, think tanks, and human rights institutions created the report by collecting data from media, research articles, government documents, and other sources. 

That data was then used to score a country's political rights on a scale of 0-40 and its civil liberties on a scale of 0-60.

Freedom House measured political rights by the degree with which a country's elections are free and fair, as well as by how much political pluralism and participation there is. Civil liberties, on the other hand, were measured by how free and independent the media is and how much freedom of expression and assembly there is.

In the ranking below, countries with a shared freedom rating were listed by alphabetical order, except for the three countries that received the top score.

Check out the 27 countries with the most freedom below:

SEE ALSO: FBI data reveals some of the most violent cities in nearly every state

27. United Kingdom

Freedom Score: 94

The United Kingdom received a score of 95 in Freedom House's 2017 report, losing five civil liberties points in the freedom of expression and belief, rule of law, and individual rights categories.



26. Tuvalu

Freedom Score: 94

Tuvalu also received a score of 94 in Freedom House's 2017 report



25. Spain

Freedom score: 94

Spain also received a score of 94 in Freedom House's 2017 report, losing two political rights points under the functioning of government category, and four civil liberties points under the freedom of expression, rule of law, individual rights, and associational and organizational categories.

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source https://www.businessinsider.com/countries-most-freedom-in-the-world-2018-4

FBI agents reportedly sought interviews with one of Brett Kavanaugh's accusers 'as early as' Friday night

christopher wray

  • FBI agents were homing in on a potential witness to interview on Friday night, shortly after President Donald Trump authorized the agency to conduct a supplemental background check on Judge Brett Kavanaugh, according to a Los Angeles Times report.
  • FBI agents reportedly took steps to schedule an interview with one of the two additional women who came forward with their own accusations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh.
  • The attorneys for one of the two women were reportedly contacted by the FBI to schedule an interview "as early as tonight," a source for the LA Times said.

FBI agents were homing in on a potential witness to interview on Friday night, shortly after President Donald Trump authorized the agency to conduct a supplemental background check on Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court, sources in a Los Angeles Times report published Friday.

FBI agents reportedly aimed to schedule an interview with one of the two additional women who came forward with their own accusations of sexual misconduct involving Kavanaugh. Christine Blasey Ford, a California-based professor who alleged Kavanaugh was "stumbling drunk" when he sexually assaulted her during a small party in the 1980s, was the first accuser who was publicly identified.

Following the publication of Ford's account in a Washington Post report on September 16, Deborah Ramirez, a fellow Yale classmate, and Julie Swetnick, a woman who claimed to have witnessed Kavanaugh display "abusive and physically aggressive behavior toward girls," came forward with their own reports about Kavanaugh.

It was unclear if the woman the FBI reportedly took interest in on Friday was either Ramirez and Swetnick — the LA Times report did not reveal the woman's identity.

The attorneys for one of the two women from the report were reportedly contacted by the FBI to schedule an interview "as early as tonight," a source for The Times said. The sources added that the process could start sometime during the weekend.

On Thursday, lawmakers from the Senate Judiciary Committee listened to emotional testimonies from both Kavanaugh and Ford.

Ford recounted how Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed, groped her over her clothes, and covered her mouth with his hand when she started to yell. Kavanaugh "categorically and unequivocally" denied the allegation, but stopped short of claiming Ford had fabricated the incident.

Asked multiple times by lawmakers if he believed an FBI investigation would be prudent, Kavanaugh dodged the question and deferred the decision to the Judiciary Committee.

"I welcome whatever the committee wants to do, because I'm telling the truth," Kavanaugh said during the hearing.

On Friday, the committee voted along party lines to move Kavanaugh's nomination to the Senate floor. During the procedural vote, Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona conditioned his approval by asking that an FBI investigation, one that was "limited in time and scope," be conducted prior to a formal vote by the entire Senate.

The final confirmation vote for Kavanaugh is tentatively scheduled for Tuesday.

SEE ALSO: 'I had tears running down my cheeks': Christine Blasey Ford's sisters commend her decision to testify in Kavanaugh hearing

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory



source https://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-agents-interview-brett-kavanaugh-accuser-investigation-christine-ford-2018-9

Friday, September 28, 2018

The Facebook hack affecting 50 million people also let the attackers access users' Tinder, Spotify, and Instagram accounts (FB)

Mark Zuckerberg

  • Facebook got hacked, it revealed on Friday — and 50 million users' accounts were compromised.
  • What's more, if the victims logged into other services — like Tinder, Instagram, or Spotify — with their Facebook accounts, those might be affected to.
  • It's not clear whether the attackers did this, but the possibility may force companies that rely on Facebook's login system to launch their own investigations.
  • Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was among the 50 million affected users.

Life just got worse for the 50 million people caught up in what may be the biggest hack of Facebook ever.

On Friday, the Silicon Valley tech firm revealed that it had detected a security breach in which an as-yet unknown attacker, or attackers, managed to gain access to tens of millions of users' accounts by exploiting vulnerabilities in its software.

But it wasn't until a second, follow-up conference call with reporters on Friday that Facebook acknowledged one of the most alarming parts of the incident: Not only did the hackers obtain the ability to access the Facebook accounts of the affected users, they also had access to any other service in which a person used their Facebook account to register — including apps like Tinder, Spotify, and Airbnb. 

Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, may also have been affected.

The revelation drastically widens the potential impact of the hack, putting people's private data elsewhere across the web at risk. It may force the numerous major companies and startups reliant on Facebook's login service to audit their own systems for evidence of malicious activity as a result.

Tinder, Airbnb, and Spotify — perhaps three of the highest-profile tech companies to use Facebook's login service — did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

So what happened? In short, the attackers found a way to trick Facebook into issuing them "access tokens" — basically, digital keys — that let them access other users' accounts as if they were that user. After spotting some unusual activity earlier this month, Facebook realized what was going on on Tuesday evening and subsequently revoked these access tokens before disclosing the hack publicly on Friday — though not before 50 million people were affected.

These access keys also let the attackers theoretically access any other services that someone used Facebook's login service to log in to, whether that's dating app Tinder, or a niche smartphone game, and gain access to highly personal information. 

It's not clear whether this has actually occurred — when asked, a Facebook exec said only that the company was early in its investigation — but the possibility may force the other companies to undertake their own investigations into the issue.

It's also not yet clear who is behind the attack on Facebook, or whether the attacks were targeted, and the reason behind it. Facebook has now patched the vulnerabilities and revoked the compromised access tokens, forcing affected users to log back in (though their passwords haven't been compromised, the company says) and notifying them about the issue.

But there are at least two high-profile victims of the hack that we know about: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and COO Sheryl Sandberg. A spokesperson confirmed that the company's two top execs were both among the tens of millions of users affected.

Do you work at Facebook? Got a tip? Contact this reporter via Signal or WhatsApp at +1 (650) 636-6268 using a non-work phone, email at rprice@businessinsider.com, WeChat at robaeprice, or Twitter DM at @robaeprice. (PR pitches by email only, please.) You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Now read:

SEE ALSO: 10 stars leading Google's efforts to build a media and entertainment empire

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Apple unveil the new iPhone XR, XS, and XS Max



source https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-hack-tinder-instagram-spotify-accounts-2018-9

Facebook just announced it was hacked, and almost 50 million users have been affected (FB)

Mark Zuckerberg

  • Facebook announced a major new security breach on Friday.
  • 50 million users accounts were affected by the attack, in which attackers were able to take over users' accounts.
  • It's not yet clear who's behind the attack.

Facebook just disclosed a major new hack affecting almost 50 million users.

The Silicon Valley tech firm discovered on Tuesday that attackers had taken advantage of a security flaw to take over users' accounts. The company's stock dropped 3% on the news.

Facebook's VP of Product Management Guy Rosen wrote in a blog post announcing the news on Friday: "Our investigation is still in its early stages. But it’s clear that attackers exploited a vulnerability in Facebook’s code that impacted 'View As', a feature that lets people see what their own profile looks like to someone else. This allowed them to steal Facebook access tokens which they could then use to take over people’s accounts.

"Access tokens are the equivalent of digital keys that keep people logged in to Facebook so they don’t need to re-enter their password every time they use the app."

Facebook says it's not yet clear who is behind the attack.

The company is holding a press call on Friday morning with the media; Business Insider will attend and update this story with more information as it becomes available. 

This story is developing... 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An environmental group is testing giant floating pipes to clean up oceans



source https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-security-attack-affecting-50-million-users-2018-9

Stephen Colbert mocks Brett Kavanaugh's blistering Senate hearing: 'Please, save your indignation'

colbert kavanaugh

  • Stephen Colbert on Thursday criticized the "indignation" of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's defense in his Senate hearing earlier that day, following Christine Blasey Ford's sworn testimony that he sexually assaulted her. 
  • "Please, save your indignation that, finally, someone is taking one woman's accusation of sexual assault seriously," Colbert said in his monologue. 

 

Stephen Colbert on Thursday criticized the "indignation" Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh showed in his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing earlier that day, following the sworn testimony of Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault before the committee.

Colbert started his monologue by playing clips of conservative commentators on Fox News calling Ford's testimony "very sympathetic," "exceptionally credible," and "a disaster for Republicans."

The "Late Show" host then turned to Kavanaugh's angry, impassioned defense of himself and attacks on the hearing's process.

"Perhaps the Kavanaugh quote that sticks with me is his passionate condemnation of the hearing and its repercussions," Colbert said. 

"You sowed the wind for decades to come," Kavanaugh said in his opening statement at the hearing, in an extended condemnation of Democratic senators. "I fear that the whole country will reap the whirlwind."

"You really need a better weatherman," Colbert said. "Because let me tell you, brother, this is the whirlwind, and the wind was sown when Donald Trump had 19 credible allegations of sexual assault against him, bragged about sexual assault on tape. And your Republican buddies up on that committee said, 'Yeah, but we want our guy on the Supreme Court' — and that's you, Brett. That doesn't mean you're guilty, but please, save your indignation that, finally, someone is taking one woman's accusation of sexual assault seriously."

The "Late Show" host then showed a clip of Kavanaugh saying at the hearing, “Today, I have to say, I fear for the future."

"#MeToo," Colbert replied.

Watch the monologue below:

SEE ALSO: Here's an evolving count of which senators are voting for Trump's Supreme Court pick

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A top movie actor reveals how he learns different accents



source https://www.businessinsider.com/stephen-colbert-mocks-brett-kavanaugh-senate-hearing-video-2018-9

We spent 3 nights with a NYC crime reporter to see how safe the 'safest big city' in the US really is

NYC crime bronx shooting

In 1990, after a record high 2,262 homicides, some called New York City the "murder capital" of the country. But since then, the murder rate has steadily declined.

The Big Apple had about 290 homicides in 2017, the lowest in 70 years, according to the New York Daily News.

Some have even dubbed today's NYC "the safest big city" in the US.

To get a better sense of what NYC's streets are like these days, we spent three nights with NY Daily News crime reporter Kerry Burke, considered by many to be the best in the city.

Burke, 55, reported from ground zero on 9/11, helped break the Eric Garner story, and was even on a few episodes of Bravo's "Tabloid Wars" in 2006. He said he had been to roughly four shootings a week since he started the job 16 years ago.

The first night we spent with Kerry passed with few incidents — perhaps a sign of the safer times. But the last two nights told a different story.

Here's what we saw.

(This story was originally published in September 2017.)

SEE ALSO: I spent the weekend with a homeless community in New York to see what it's really like to live on the streets

DON'T MISS: I covered murders during Chicago's deadliest year in decades — here's what I saw

Night 1: I met Burke in the Bronx while he was trying to find a man who had just been acquitted on murder charges.

"How are ya, Mr. Brown?" he said in a Boston accent.

Burke, who grew up in Boston's Dorchester housing projects, was rather formal at first, but switched right away to "bro" or "brotha," like he called almost every other guy I met with him.

He filled me in on the details about the man he was looking for before we walked to the guy's last known address.

Residents in the building told him the man no longer lived there, so Burke asked people in other buildings and nearby stores whether they knew him.

"Bodegas are the best," he said. "They know everything that goes on in the neighborhood, and they know everybody."



He walked into one unlocked neighboring apartment building and knocked on doors.

Burke was adept at talking to and gaining the trust of all different sorts of people, and he stressed the importance of being polite.

"Maybe it's because I'm a troubled Catholic that I always say thank you," Burke said, adding that he "might have to come back" to get more information too.

After about an hour or so, Burke was able to get the man's phone number but was unable to reach him.

He later heard that a murder suspect was being questioned at the 32nd precinct and decided to go wait outside in the hopes of getting a statement when the suspect walked out.



Around 11 p.m., the suspect's cousin walked out of the precinct. Burke asked him a few questions but didn't get much.

Throughout the eight hours I spent with Burke that first night, there were no homicides and only one shooting — a man hit in the buttocks.

The victim was immediately stabilized, and since the incident was not serious and happened more than an hour away from us, we didn't go.

I took the lack of homicides or serious shootings during Burke's shift — especially given it was a Friday night — as a good sign. But it was only the first night.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source https://www.businessinsider.com/how-safe-is-new-york-city-murder-rate-shadowing-nyc-crime-reporter-2017-10

Thursday, September 27, 2018

American Bar Association urges lawmakers to shelve Kavanaugh voting until a 'thorough FBI investigation' is conducted

Brett Kavanaugh

  • The American Bar Association published a letter urging for the Senate Judiciary Committee to delay its vote on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court.
  • The ABA said the FBI should investigate the numerous sexual misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh.
  • During his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, Kavanaugh touted his "unanimous, well-qualified rating" from the ABA.
  • "Each appointment to our nation's Highest Court (as with all others) is simply too important to rush to a vote," ABA president Robert Carlson said.

The American Bar Association published a letter urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to delay its vote on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court until the FBI conducts an investigation into the numerous sexual misconduct allegations against him, according to a CNN report published Thursday.

"The basic principles that underscore the Senate's constitutional duty of advice and consent on federal judicial nominees require nothing less than a careful examination of the accusations and facts by the FBI," ABA president Robert Carlson said in a letter, CNN reported.

"Each appointment to our nation's Highest Court (as with all others) is simply too important to rush to a vote," Carlson added. "Deciding to proceed without conducting additional investigation would not only have a lasting impact on the Senate's reputation, but it will also negatively affect the great trust necessary for the American people to have in the Supreme Court."

News of the ABA's letter, which was addressed to Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California — both of whom sit on the Judiciary Committee — comes hours after Kavanaugh testified on Capitol Hill before the committee Thursday. During his testimony, Kavanaugh touted his "unanimous, well-qualified rating" from the ABA.

The ABA defines its "well-qualified" rating for Supreme Court nominees to be "found to merit the Committee’s strongest affirmative endorsement." 

The organization added that allowing a "thorough FBI investigation" from the Senate, a potential development Democratic lawmakers have fervently called for, into the allegations would "demonstrate its commitment to a Supreme Court that is above reproach."

During his hearing, lawmakers asked Kavanaugh multiple times whether he believed an FBI investigation into the allegations would be prudent. Kavanaugh sidestepped the question and deferred the decision to the committee.

"I welcome whatever the committee wants to do because I'm telling the truth," Kavanaugh said.

The ABA's warning comes less than 12 hours before the Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote on whether to recommend Kavanaugh nomination. Although there were believed to be a few key holdouts from Republican lawmakers, some of them, including Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, expressed they were ready to approve of Kavanaugh's nomination.

SEE ALSO: 'I don't know. Have you?': Kavanaugh apologizes to Democratic senator after defensive quip about his drinking habits

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory



source https://www.businessinsider.com/american-bar-association-brett-kavanaugh-delay-vote-fbi-should-investigate-2018-9

'The Senate must vote!': Trump backs Brett Kavanaugh's 'powerful, honest, and riveting testimony,' and urges lawmakers to confirm his nomination to the Supreme Court

Brett Kavanaugh Donald Trump

  • President Donald Trump appeared optimistic following a contentious public hearing and urged the Senate Judiciary Committee to push for a vote on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court.
  • "Judge Kavanaugh showed America exactly why I nominated him," Trump said in a tweet on Thursday afternoon. "His testimony was powerful, honest, and riveting."
  • Trump's remarks come amid a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, a professor who has accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault.

President Donald Trump appeared optimistic following a contentious public hearing and urged the Senate Judiciary Committee to push for a vote on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court.

"Judge Kavanaugh showed America exactly why I nominated him," Trump said in a tweet on Thursday. "His testimony was powerful, honest, and riveting."

"Democrats' search and destroy strategy is disgraceful and this process has been a total sham and effort to delay, obstruct, and resist," Trump added. "The Senate must vote!"

Trump's remarks come amid a hearing with Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, a professor who has accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault.

Trump, who publicly endorsed Kavanaugh after several women came forward with sexual misconduct allegations, previously said he was open to hearing Ford's testimony but accused Democrats of trying to railroad what should have been a seamless vote along party lines.

"The Democrats are playing this game that's disgraceful," Trump said on Wednesday. "It's disgraceful to this country."

A vote on Kavanaugh's nomination was is scheduled for Friday morning, but as of Thursday night, it was unclear whether the process would be delayed. Democrats have urged for an FBI investigation into Ford's allegations.

Kavanaugh, who frequently appeared combative with the line of inquiry from Democrats, said he "will not be intimidated into withdrawing from this process." 

"You may defeat me in the final vote, but you'll never get me to quit, never," Kavanaugh said.

SEE ALSO: LIVE: Christine Blasey Ford says she's '100%' certain Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory



source https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-kavanaugh-opinion-vote-senate-christine-ford-hearing-2018-9

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

How Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein became one of the most-watched officials in Washington

rod rosenstein wild monday

Speculation swirled Monday that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein would soon be fired or resign.

After the White House confirmed Rosenstein was safe for now, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders announced he and President Donald Trump would meet on Thursday, leaving intelligence officials temporarily relieved.

But the justice department head's future is still uncertain.

On Friday, The New York Times reported that Rosenstein had discussed using the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office and wearing a wire to record their conversations. Rosenstein has disputed the report, but it is said to have pushed Trump to weigh firing Rosenstein.

Rosenstein's authority over the special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russia's meddling in the 2016 US election has made his fate a top concern for lawmakers and officials.

Here's how the "poster child for the professional, competent, ethical, and fair-minded prosecutor" became one of the most-watched officials in Washington:

SEE ALSO: Here's who could replace Rod Rosenstein if he's fired

DON'T MISS: If Rod Rosenstein is on his way out, exactly how it goes down could have major consequences for how Trump can proceed

Rod Jay Rosenstein was born on January 13, 1965, in Philadelphia.



He earned an economics degree in 1986 from the University of Pennsylvania, where Trump graduated from the Wharton School 20 years earlier. In 1989, Rosenstein graduated from Harvard Law School.

Source: US News and World Report



After clerking with the DC Court of Appeals, Kenneth Starr recruited Rosenstein to investigate former President Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Whitewater Development Corporation business in Arkansas.

Source: Department of Justice



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source https://www.businessinsider.com/rod-rosenstein-bio-pictures-deputy-attorney-general-trump-history-2018-9

Meet Michael Avenatti, the high-profile lawyer and professional sports car driver who represents Stormy Daniels and might run for president

michael avenatti Stormy Daniels Lawyer

  • Michael Avenatti is an attorney whose most famous client is Stormy Daniels.
  • He has inserted himself into the national conversation this year, often making claims about high-profile people, including President Donald Trump and Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
  • Avenatti is also considering a 2020 presidential bid.
  • Here's a look at his career, and claims he's made over the last several months.

At the moment, Michael Avenatti may be the most high-profile lawyer in America. The 47-year-old seasoned litigator has made headlines in recent months thanks to his famous client, porn star and director Stormy Daniels.

Just days before the 2016 US election, President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen arranged a $130,000 payment to Daniels to keep her silent about an affair she allegedly had with Trump in 2006.

Avenatti has since sued the president, on Daniels' behalf, accusing Trump of invalidating a non-disclosure agreement, and of defaming Daniels. Avenatti says the violation allows Daniels to reveal her side of the story to the public, and in March, she started doing just that with a blockbuster "60 Minutes" interview on CBS News.

Appearing on dozens of cable news shows, tweeting frequently, and often making claims that he has explosive information on people in the news, Avenatti has attempted to make himself a household name — and he's even mulling a 2020 presidential bid.

Most recently, he announced that he has evidence of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh participating in sexual misconduct in high school and that he was representing a group of people who could back up the claims.

Here's what you should know about Michael Avenatti:

SEE ALSO: Meet 'Stormy Daniels', the porn star Trump's lawyer paid to keep quiet about an alleged sexual affair — who's finally telling her side of the story

DON'T MISS: Here are all the sexual-misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh

Avenatti graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1996. Three years later, he received his JD degree from George Washington University.



During college and law school, Avenatti worked for The Research Group, a campaign research firm founded by Rahm Emmanuel, former President Barack Obama's chief of staff and the current Democratic mayor of Chicago.

Source: Chicago Magazine



After graduating law school, Avenatti worked at O'Melveny & Myers, a high-powered Los Angeles law firm. Over the course of his legal career, he has contributed to several high-profile cases involving Paris Hilton, Jim Carrey, and members of the rock band The Eagles.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source https://www.businessinsider.com/michael-avenatti-bio-lawyer-representing-stormy-daniels-2018-3

Bill Cosby sentenced to 3 to 10 years in prison for sexual assault

Bill cosby

  • Bill Cosby was sentenced to three to 10 years in state prison at a Norristown, Pennsylvania, court on Tuesday. 
  • The 81-year-old comedian faced up to 10 years in prison after he was convicted in April of drugging and sexually assaulting a woman over a decade ago. 
  • A judge declared Cosby a "sexually violent predator" ahead of his sentencing, requiring the comic's name to appear on a sex-offender registry. 

 

Bill Cosby was sentenced to three to 10 years in state prison at a Norristown, Pennsylvania, court on Tuesday.

The 81-year-old comedian faced up to 10 years in prison after he was convicted in April of drugging and sexually assaulting Temple University women’s basketball administrator Andrea Constand at his suburban Philadelphia estate in 2004.

Montgomery County Judge Steven O’Neill made the decision after declaring Cosby a "sexually violent predator" ahead of his sentencing, requiring the comic to appear on a sex-offender registry and undergo monthly counseling for the rest of his life. 

"It is time for justice. Mr. Cosby, this has all circled back to you. The time has come," O’Neill said in his sentencing decision.

Cosby’s lawyers had asked for house arrest, saying Cosby — who is legally blind — is too old and vulnerable to do time in prison. Prosecutors asked for five to 10 years behind bars, saying the comic could still be a threat to women. He will serve his time in state prison.

Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele rejected the notion that “age, infirmity, should somehow equate to mercy.”

“He was good at hiding this for a long time. Good at suppressing this for a long time. So it’s taken a long time to get there,” Steele said.

Cosby’s lawyers had fought the “sexually violent predator” designation, arguing that Pennsylvania’s sex-offender law is unconstitutional and that he is no threat to the public at his age. But O’Neill said prosecutors had met their burden of proof by “clear and convincing” evidence.

When the ruling came down, a woman in courtroom shot her fist into the air and whispered, “Yes!”

Meanwhile, Constand said in a statement submitted to the court and released Tuesday that she has had to cope with years of anxiety and self-doubt that had left her “stuck in a holding pattern.”

Constand, 45, said her training as a professional basketball player had led her to think she could handle anything, but “life as I knew it” ended on the night she said Cosby knocked her out with pills and penetrated her with his fingers as she lay nearly paralyzed on a couch.

Constand said she now lives alone with her two dogs and has trouble trusting people.

“When the sexual assault happened, I was a young woman brimming with confidence and looking forward to a future bright with possibilities,” she wrote in her five-page statement.

“Now, almost 15 years later, I’m a middle-aged woman who’s been stuck in a holding pattern for most of her adult life, unable to heal fully or to move forward.”

She also wrote: “We may never know the full extent of his double life as a sexual predator but his decades-long reign of terror as a serial rapist is over.”

In the years since Constand first went to authorities in 2005, more than 60 women have accused Cosby of sexual misconduct, though none of those claims have led to criminal charges.

Cosby was smiling and joking with his spokesman and sheriff’s deputies as he settled into the courtroom Tuesday. On Day 1 of the sentencing, the comic laughed at times as the psychologist for the state testified.

Cameras were not allowed in the courtroom; they are generally banned in Pennsylvania.

Cosby became the first black actor to star in a prime-time TV show, “I Spy,” in 1965. He remained a Hollywood A-lister for much of the next half-century.

Associated Press writers Maryclaire Dale, Michael R. Sisak, and Claudia Lauer contributed to this report.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How actors fake fight in movies



source https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-cosby-sentenced-tk-years-in-prison-for-sexual-assault-2018-9

Monday, September 24, 2018

John Oliver blasted Trump and Fox News for defending Kavanaugh amid sexual assault allegations

last week tonight with john oliver

  • John Oliver on Sunday took on President Trump and Fox News analyst Jeanine Pirro for their defenses of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, amid the sexual assault allegations against him.
  • The episode focused on reactions to the first allegation of sexual assault against Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford. It was taped before an article published by The New Yorker brought a new allegation of sexual assault against Kavanaugh by Deborah Ramirez, a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's. 

 

John Oliver on Sunday criticized President Trump and Fox News analyst Jeanine Pirro, among others, for their defenses of Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, whose nomination has been rocked by sexual assault allegations

Sunday's "Last Week Tonight" episode was taped before an article published by The New Yorker brought a new allegation of sexual assault against Kavanaugh by Deborah Ramirez, a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's. Oliver's show thus focused on reactions to the first allegation of sexual assault against Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford, who is set to publicly testify about her allegation before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. 

The "Last Week Tonight" host first took on Fox News host and Jeannine Pirro. Pirro last week criticized Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein for keeping Ford's allegation under wraps until Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing, despite first hearing from Ford about it in July. 

“And Dianne: Why would you wait to even send it to the FBI? Is it because nothing in you and your path of demon-rats — that’s what I said, demon-rats — Democrats’ bag of tricks was working against Kavanaugh?” Pirro said in a clip Oliver played. 

Oliver then threw to another clip of Pirro calling Democrats "demon-rats," and joked, "Jeanine: Stop trying to make demon-rats happen." 

He moved on to Trump, who last week tweeted that Ford should prove her allegation with a police filing. 

"I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!" Trump tweeted. 

"So the president cast doubt on someone who says she was sexually assaulted, while also sort of implying that her parents don’t love her. To borrow a phrase, that’s one of the most s---headed things I’ve seen from the standpoint of s---headedness," Oliver said.

Watch the episode on HBO.

SEE ALSO: Why Democrats brought up the Kavanaugh accusations at the last minute when they've known since July

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How actors fake fight in movies



source https://www.businessinsider.com/john-oliver-blasts-trump-fox-news-for-defending-kavanaugh-amid-allegations-2018-9

Sunday, September 23, 2018

As the controversies pile up, Google misses the skillset of this former exec more than ever (GOOG, GOOGL)

Eric-Schmidt

  • Since Eric Schmidt stepped down as executive chairman in December, Google has been without its most seasoned and effective spokesman.
  • When Schmidt was running Google, he reveled in the spotlight.
  • None of Google's current leaders seem interested or capable of taking over for Schmidt in that regard.
  • That's too bad, because with Donald Trump and the far right bearing down, Google needs someone to make its case.

When Google’s business practices came under scrutiny earlier this summer and members of the Senate wanted to hear from one of the company’s top leaders, Google declined.

The Senate Intelligence Committee voiced its displeasure by placing a name card bearing Google's name at the same table where Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg testified, even though no one from Google showed up.

But back on Sept 21, 2011, at a previous Congressional hearing, Google wasn’t satisfied to be represented by an empty chair.

Instead, the company's managers dispatched Eric Schmidt to Capitol Hill. Lawmakers grilled Schmidt, Google's then executive chairman, about whether the company was using its search engine to promote its own products over rivals. Schmidt strode into the hearing room that day grinning. While he didn’t convince every lawmaker that Google wasn’t “cooking” search results, the pundits said he more than held his own.

“You had to know going into this that Eric Schmidt was too smart and too practiced an operator to let himself get cornered,” Charles Cooper, a columnist with CBS Interactive, wrote at the time. “Schmidt didn't come close to breaking a sweat.”

Larry Page

Compare that with how Google responded to the Senate's questions two weeks ago. Dorsey and Sandberg appeared at the Sept. 5 hearing called by the Senate Intelligence Committee, and answered queries about the role social networks play in US elections.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai or Chairman Larry Page, were no shows, and Google was criticized from all sides. The imagery of the empty chair during the hearing was a constant reminder of the company's absence. Tom Wheeler, the former FCC chairman, summed it up this way: Google’s decision not to appear was “a strategic mistake of virtually incalculable proportions.”

The stark differences in the two responses to near-similar situations highlights the huge hole that Google has yet to fill since Schmidt stepped down as chairman in December. Schmidt, who was Google’s CEO from 2001 to 2011, was a leader who thrived in the spotlight, and reveled as Google’s point man anytime the company drew fire.

He was equal parts salesman, statesman, and technologist.

And now, more than ever, Google is missing that kind of frontman, someone in authority who can stand before the cameras during a crisis, and effectively make the company’s case.

Google misses Schmidt, historically its best spokesman

The President of the United States and his allies have targeted Google.

Without providing much proof, Donald Trump has accused Google’s leaders of “rigging” its search platform to muffle the voices of political conservatives and to deliver only bad news about his administration.

More recently, the far right has claimed that a recent series of rather banal news leaks at Google supports their claim that the company is using its influence to wage war on Republicans. Google has continually denied these allegations, but the controversies keep cropping up.

On Thursday evening, The Wall Street Journal reported that it had seen an email exchange from last year between Google employees in which they discussed potential ways to tweak Google’s search results to help those protesting Trump’s travel ban on people from Muslim countries.

Google said the email chain only contained proposals, and that they were never implemented, reiterating that the company does not bias Google search for political reasons.  

Sundar Pichai

At this rate, one has to wonder how long before lawmakers compel Google to testify.

In the three years since being named CEO, Pichai has proven himself capable enough of addressing the Google I/O developer conferences, speaking to friendly crowds with the aid of teleprompters and rehearsals.

It remains to be seen, however, whether he’s as effective a spokesman when faced with a hostile audience in impromptu situations that are high stakes.

“Unlike the CEOs of the other large tech companies, Pichai has kept a much lower profile,” said Tim Calkins, clinical professor of marketing at Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management. “Most people know the CEOs of the other big companies, but I’m not sure anyone knows Pichai. I think it’s important for an individual to become the recognizable leader of a company. It puts a human face on what would otherwise be faceless.”

As for the company’s other top leaders, Page and Google co-founder Sergey Brin, neither has shown much interest of late in addressing the public on Google’s behalf, which should leave Google pining for Schmidt — and not just for his communication skills.

In 2007, Schmidt was interviewed on stage at the annual National Association of Broadcasters conference. At the time, Google was attempting to acquire DoubleClick, the web-ad services company.

The interviewer noted that Microsoft had complained loudly to US regulators that the deal would kill competition and that they should fear Google’s growing size.

“Microsoft?” Schmidt deadpanned.

With one word, expressed with faux surprise, Schmidt instantly cast doubt on Google's accuser. A decade before, the US government had famously brought a massive antitrust case against Microsoft. To much of the public, Microsoft was still the symbol of anti-competitive practices. 

The audience laughed and applauded. Just off stage, the faces of Schmidt's assistants lit up. 

Schmidt’s swagger, quick wit, and sense of theater are character traits that can inspire employees, as well as win over the public. Sometimes, those are the kinds of traits that can even help sway skeptical lawmakers.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Apple unveil a new, bigger watch



source https://www.businessinsider.com/why-it-matters-that-google-no-longer-has-eric-schmidt-as-the-controversies-pile-up-2018-9

Friday, September 21, 2018

A gender discrimination lawsuit against Microsoft could see new light as court agrees to reconsider class action status for 8,600 current and former employees (MSFT)

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella

  • A gender discrimination lawsuit first filed against Microsoft in 2015 could get new life.
  • The Ninth Circuit court of appeals on Thursday said it will reconsider allowing the complaint to proceed as a class action lawsuit on behalf of more than 8,600 current and former Microsoft employees. 
  • The lawsuit, filed on behalf of three women who used to work at Microsoft, alleges that the $876 billion tech company systemically discriminated against female engineers and IT employees.

A gender discrimination lawsuit against Microsoft first filed in 2015 could see new light following an appeals court's decision to reconsider the case's class action status on Thursday.

The lawsuit, Moussouris v. Microsoft Corporation, alleges that Microsoft's "company-wide policies and practices systematically violate female technical employees’ rights and result in the unchecked gender bias that pervades its corporate culture."

Three former Microsoft employees Katherine Moussouris, Holly Muenchow and Dana Piermarini are named as plaintiffs in the case, first filed in September 2015. In their case, the plaintiffs describe a corporate culture in which gender bias went unchecked, and in which the human resources department was of little recourse. 

The discovery process revealed that Microsoft's internal complaint investigation team only substantiated one out of 120 gender discrimination complaints made by female technical employees between 2010 to 2016, according to a statement issued by the plaintiffs' team. 

The plaintiffs were first denied class action status on June 25, by a district court in the state of Washington. Judge James Robart issued a 68-page denial, which ultimately argued that the plaintiffs failed to make their case that the women's experiences affected an entire class of people. 

If the Ninth Circuit overturns the ruling and grants class certification, it would represent a significant victory for the plaintiffs and expose the software company to potentially hefty financial penalties should it lose at trial. The plaintiffs are seeking to certify a class of more than 8,600 women in various Microsoft offices across the US and seeking compensatory and punitive damages.

Microsoft has until January 31, 2019 to file its opposition. However, a lawyer for the plaintiffs said that this schedule could change due to the holidays.

Microsoft did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

SEE ALSO: Microsoft just hired a chief diversity officer — and IBM is suing over it

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: One bite from this tick could ruin red meat for the rest of your life



source https://www.businessinsider.com/ninth-circuit-court-reconsider-class-action-status-microsoft-gender-discrimination-lawsuit-2018-9

Google is scurrying to kill a new internal leak about its plans for China (GOOG, GOOGL)

Sundar Pichai

  • A Google internal memo detailing the company's China plans was circulated within the company, according to a report in The Intercept.
  • The memo revealed that Google's China search app would provide a third-party company in China with access to user search data.

 

Google's security team as well as the company's human resources department are trying to stop the company's staff from sharing a memo containing secret information regarding the company's plans for China, The Intercept reported Friday.

An  engineer who was asked to work on Project Dragonfly, the codename for a search product designed for the China market, was the person who wrote the memo, according to the news report. The information within the memo appears to contradicts statements made by Google CEO Sundar Pichai that the company's efforts on a Chinese search engine were exploratory. 

Google's China efforts mark a major reversal of its 2010 decision to pull its search operations out of China rather than censor information. The project to re-enter China has been hugely controversial inside the company, and several Google employees have resigned in protest

As part of Dragonfly, Google has allegedly created a search engine that would censor information that the Chinese government finds objectionable. The memo shows that Google planned to require users to log in to perform searches and the software would then track their location. The memo also said that Google would share Chinese users' search information with a third-party Chinese company, which could then be available to government authorities, the Intercept report.

Google representatives were not immediately available for comment.

The Intercept reported that Google's leaders learned of the memo and then made attempts to force workers who accessed or saved the memo to delete the information. The emails from HR contained special 'pixel trackers' to let HR know employees had read the note, The Intercept reported.

Read the full Intercept story here.

SEE ALSO: A wave of news leaks is triggering a crackdown at Google and causing fears that the culture is being ‘openly destroyed’

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Everything we know about Samsung’s foldable phone



source https://www.businessinsider.com/google-kill-leak-about-china-plans-report-2018-9

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

The 100 best crime movies of all time, according to critics

no country for old men

The old media adage, "If it bleeds, it leads," also describes a common narrative approach in cinema.

Because criminality and violence make for inherently compelling cinematic material, both are featured prominently in many of the greatest films of all time.

The Metacritic data we compiled here to track the most critically acclaimed crime movies in history traces a lineage of great films from contemporary thrillers like "No Country for Old Men" and "Hell or High Water," to classics like "The Godfather" (Parts I and II) and "On the Waterfront."

The list includes all of the highest-rated movies that feature a "crime" tag on the site, which turned out to be a wide-ranging categorization, encompassing feature films and documentaries. That said, we did exclude several movies from Metacritic's list that had no clear relation to crime. 

Here are the 100 best crime movies of all time, according to critics:

SEE ALSO: The 100 best science fiction movies of all time, according to critics

100. "Animal Kingdom" (2010)

Critic score: 83/100

User score: 7.8/10

What critics said: "Don't be fooled: In this unpeaceable kingdom, the den mama is also ready to eat her young." — Entertainment Weekly



99. "Paranoid Park" (2007)

Critic score: 83/100

User score: 6.6/10

What critics said: "Youth and death meet again in Gus Van Sant’s 'Paranoid Park,' a gorgeously stark, mesmerizingly elliptical story told in the same lyrical-prosaic style that has characterized his latest films." — Los Angeles Times



98. "Bus 174" (2002)

Critic score: 83/100

User score: 7.5/10

What critics said: "Tense, engrossing, and superbly structured, 'Bus 174' is not just unforgettable drama but a skillfully developed argument." — Village Voice



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

source https://www.businessinsider.com/best-crime-movies-all-time-critics-2018-9

Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Brett Kavanaugh's accuser wants the FBI to investigate her claims before she testifies to Senate committee, and it could delay his Supreme Court confirmation indefinitely

Brett Kavanaugh

  • Attorneys for Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during their high school years in the 1980s, wants "a full investigation by law enforcement officials" of the alleged incident.
  • Ford's attorneys said in a letter that a federal investigation must be conducted, prior to any hearings, in order "ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed."
  • Prior to the letter, lawmakers were awaiting Ford's response to their request for a public hearing set for Monday.
  • The letter also confirmed earlier reports that Ford, a mother of two teenagers, was targeted with death threats after she came forward with her allegations against Kavanaugh.

Attorneys for Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during their high school years in the 1980s, said she wants "a full investigation by law enforcement officials" for the alleged incident prior to her making an appearance in a public hearing, according to a CNN report published Tuesday.

Ford's attorney's wrote in a letter to Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee, saying that an FBI investigation would "ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner," and would be critical "before conducting any hearing or making any decisions."

"We would welcome the to opportunity to talk with you and Ranking Member [Dianne] Feinstein to discuss reasonable steps as to how Dr. Ford can cooperate while also taking care of her own health and security," the letter reportedly said.

"What we're saying is there should be an investigation because that's the right thing to do," Lisa Banks, Ford's attorney, said to CNN host Anderson Cooper. "She is prepared to cooperate with the committee and with any law enforcement investigation."

Sen. Diane Feinstein of California, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, cosigned Ford's request for an investigation.

"We should honor Dr. Blasey Ford’s wishes and delay this hearing," Feinstein said in a statement on Tuesday. "A proper investigation must be completed, witnesses interviewed, evidence reviewed and all sides spoken to. Only then should the chairman set a hearing date."

Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch, who chairs the finance committee, pushed back on Ford's request for an FBI investigation: "The FBI does not do investigations like this. The responsibility falls to us," Hatch wrote, reiterating Grassley's offer to let Ford testify before the Judiciary Committee.

"We should proceed as planned," he said.

The letter also confirmed earlier reports that Ford, a mother of two teenagers, was targeted with death threats.

Earlier on Tuesday, the New York Times reported that after Ford went public with her allegation, she moved out of her house and arranged for a private security detail after she received vulgar emails and messages on social media.

Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court, was said to be "stumbling drunk" when he allegedly sexually assaulted Ford during a party in high school. She claimed Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed, groped her over her clothes, and covered her mouth with his hand when she started to scream.

Prior to the letter from Ford's attorneys, lawmakers were left in limbo after multiple messages for Ford to appear in a public hearing went unanswered. After the Senate Judiciary Committee's planned vote for Kavanaugh's confirmation on Thursday was delayed, the committee announced on Monday it would hold a public hearing next week for Kavanaugh and Ford.

Kavanaugh has categorically denied the allegation and said he would testify to "refute this false allegation."

It is unclear if a full investigation would be concluded before the planned public hearing on Monday. Key witnesses appeared reluctant to discuss the alleged incident or have no memory of it. Mark Judge, Kavanaugh's former classmate who became implicated in the allegation, already signaled that he was unwilling to appear before the Judiciary Committee. 

"I have no more information to offer the Committee and I do not wish to speak publicly regarding the incidents described in Dr. Ford's letter," Judge said in a statement.

SEE ALSO: Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation chances are starting to unravel

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump MAGA hat factory



source https://www.businessinsider.com/brett-kavanaughs-accuser-calls-for-fbi-investigation-2018-9

The woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault reportedly had to move out of her house and hire private security after receiving death threats

Brett Kavanaugh

  • Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during their high school years in the 1980s, has moved out of her house and hired private security because of death threats she has received since coming forward.
  • Ford, a mother of two teenagers, has received vulgar emails and messages on social media, a New York Times report said.
  • "From what I've heard you have 6 months to live, you disgusting slime," one of the messages reportedly read.
  • Ford and her attorney have yet to respond to invitations to testify at a public hearing about her allegations against Kavanaugh.

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during their high school years in the 1980s, has moved out of her house and hired private security detail because of death threats she has received since coming forward.

A person familiar with the matter told The New York Times that Ford, a mother of two teenagers, began receiving vulgar emails and messages on social media.

"From what I've heard you have 6 months to live, you disgusting slime," one of the messages allegedly read.

The Times' source added that Ford has also received supportive messages after giving her account of the alleged incident: "Ninety percent of people think she's a hero and are extremely supportive of her, and 10 percent want her to die immediately," the person told the newspaper.

In July, Ford initially wrote about her allegation in a letter that was eventually sent to Sen. Diane Feinstein of California, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. At the time, Ford reportedly expected her story to remain confidential and her identity anonymous. Ford decided to go public with her account after it was leaked and inaccurate reports emerged.

"These are all the ills that I was trying to avoid," Ford said to The Washington Post. "Now I feel like my civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and terror about retaliation."

The committee's planned vote for Kavanaugh's confirmation on Thursday was delayed after Democrats and a few key Republican lawmakers expressed hesitation about moving forward. The committee announced on Monday it would hold a public hearing next week for Kavanaugh and Ford.

Kavanaugh has denied the allegation and said he would testify to "refute this false allegation" and "defend my integrity."

Until late Tuesday, Ford and her attorney had not yet responded to the committee's hearing request. It soon emerged that the attorney sent a letter to the Republican Senate Judiciary chairman Chuck Grassley, asking that the FBI investigate Ford's accusations against Kavanaugh to "ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner."

The letter revealed Tuesday evening confirmed The New York Times' earlier reporting about threats Ford has received, saying Ford has "been the target of vicious harassment and even death threats."

Ford's attorney continued, according to CNN: "We would welcome the opportunity to talk with you and Ranking Member Feinstein to discuss reasonable steps as to how Dr. Ford can cooperate while also taking care of her own health and security."

SEE ALSO: Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation chances are starting to unravel

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump MAGA hat factory



source https://www.businessinsider.com/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-receives-death-threats-moves-out-of-house-hires-private-security-2018-9